Did you know that there have been more Military fatalities under Liberal Presidents than under Republican Presidents?

Read below this information comes from Congressional research service:http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf.)

> >>>> DO YOU THINK THIS WILL BE PUBLISHED IN THE NEW YORK TIMES?
> >>>>
> >>>> Military Losses, 1980 thru 2007
> >>>> Whatever your politics, however you lean, and
> >>>> however
> >>>> you feel about the current administration, this
> >>>> report
> >>>> should open some eyes. Military losses, 1980 through
> >>>> 2007.
> >>>>
> >>>> As tragic as the loss of any member of the US Armed
> >>>> Forces is, consider
> >>>> the following statistics:
> >>>> The annual fatalities of military members while
> >>>> actively
> >>>> serving in the armed forces from 1980 through 2006
> >>>> - by
> >>>> any cause.
> >>>> 1980 .......... 2,392 ( Carter Year )
> >>>> 1981 .......... 2,380 ( Reagan Year)
> >>>> 1984 .......... 1,999 ( Reagan Year)
> >>>> 1988 .......... 1,819 ( Reagan Year)
> >>>> 1989 .......... 1,636 ( George H W Year )
> >>>> 1990 .......... 1,508 ( George H W Year )
> >>>> 1991 .......... 1,787 ( George H W Year )
> >>>> 1992 .......... 1,293 ( George H W Year )
> >>>> 1993 .......... 1,213 ( Clinton Year)
> >>>> 1994 .......... 1,075 ( Clinton Year)
> >>>> 1995 .......... 2,465 ( Clinton Year)
> >>>> 1996 .......... 2,318 ( Clinton Year)
> >>>> 1997 .......... 817 ( Clinton Year)
> >>>> 1998 .......... 2,252 ( Clinton Year)
> >>>> 1999 .......... 1,984 ( Clinton Year)
> >>>> 2000 ...........1,983 ( Clinton Year)
> >>>> 2001 ............ 890 ( George W Year )
> >>>> 2002 .......... 1,007 ( George W Year )
> >>>> 2003 .......... 1,410 ( George W Year )
> >>>> 2004 .......... 1,887 ( George W Year )
> >>>> 2005 ............ 919 ( George W Year )
> >>>> 2006............. 920 ( George W Year )
> >>>> 2007............ 899 ( George W Year )
> >>>>
> >>>> Clinton years (1993-2000): 14,107 deaths
> >>>> George W years (2001-2007): 7,932 deaths
> >>>>
> >>>> If you are surprised when you look at these
> >>>> figures, so
> >>>> was I. These figures mean that the loss from the two
> >>>> latest conflicts in the Middle East Are LESS than
> >>>> the
> >>>> loss of military personnel during Bill Clinton 's
> >>>> presidency; When America wasn't even involved in a
> >>>> war!
> >>>> (Unless you include Bosnia or the disgrace of
> >>>> Mogadishu,
> >>>> Somalia when Clinton failed to respond to
> >>>> terrorists;
> >>>> Remember 'Blackhawk Down'?)
> >>>>
> >>>> And, I was even more shocked ! when I read that in
> >>>> 1980, during the reign of President (Nobel Peace
> >>>> Prize
> >>>> winner) Jimmy Carter , there were 2,392 US military
> >>>> fatalities! >From what? How?
> >>>>
> >>>> I think that these figures indicate that many
> >>>> members of
> >>>> our Media and our
> >>>> Politicians will pick and choose the information on
> >>>> which
> >>>> they report. Of course we all know that they
> >>>> present only
> >>>> those 'facts' which support their agenda-driven
> >>>> reporting. But why do so many of them march in lock-
> >>>> step
> >>>> to twist the truth? Where do so many of them get
> >>>> their
> >>>> agenda? Obviously there is one shared agenda. Could
> >>>> it be
> >>>> from the most powerful Democratic family of the
> >>>> decade?
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you want further proof? Consider the latest
> >>>> census of
> >>>> Americans. It shows the following FACTS about the
> >>>> distribution of American citizens, by race:
> >>>>
> >>>> European descent ..........................69.12%
> >>>> Hispanic...................................12.5%
> >>>> Black .................... ................12.3%
> >>>> Asian...................................... 3.7%
> >>>> Native American............................ 1.0%
> >>>> Other...................................... 2.6%
> >>>>
> >>>> Many media lead us to feel the military death ratio
> >>>> is
> >>>> off balanced compared to the distribution by race in
> >>>> America . Here are the fatalities by RACE over the
> >>>> past
> >>>> three years in Iraqi Freedom. Do the comparison
> >>>> yourself.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> European descent (white) ...........74.31%
> >>>> Hispanic............................10.74%
> >>>> Black .............................. 9.67%
> >>>> Asian............................... 1.81%
> >>>> Native American..................... 1.09%
> >>>> Other............................... 0.33%
> >>>>
> >>>> I was surprised again. Our mainstream media
> >>>> continues to
> >>>> spin these figures
> >>>> (for political gain). Nothing more. It's all about
> >>>> politics.
> >>>>
> >>>> I hope that during the time between now and November,
> >>>> intelligent Americans can decipher:
> >>>> the facts from the spin, the spinners from the
> >>>> leaders,
> >>>> those who seek even more power from those that seek
> >>>> justice, and the dividers from the uniters.
> >>>>
> >>>> Over the next months let's be good listeners and
> >>>> see and
> >>>> hear who tries to divide our ! nation; and who
> >>>> wants to
> >>>> unite our nation. Who wants to control how our
> >>>> money is
> >>>> spent and who wants our money spent the way we would
> >>>> spend it. Who seeks
> >>>> power and who seeks justice? Who spins the facts
> >>>> and who
> >>>> is genuine.
> >>>>
> >>>> (These statistics are published by Congressional
> >>>> Research
> >>>> Service, and
> >>>> they may be confirmed by anyone at:
> >>>> http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf.)
> >>>>
> >>>> 'History does not entrust the care of freedom to
> >>>> the weak
> >>>> or timid.' -
> >>>> Dwight D. Eisenhower