When Will Democrats Heed America's Call For More American Energy?
Thursday, July 03, 2008Prior to leaving Washington, D.C. for the Independence Day district work period, I promised Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and other Democratic leaders that my Republican colleagues and I would be right back on the House floor on July 8, fighting for a vote on our “all of the above” plan to increase American energy production, encourage more efficiency and conservation, and promote the use of alternative fuels and biofuels. I spent the first part of this Fourth of July week in Washington state with my GOP colleagues Reps. Doc Hastings, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Dave Reichert, and what we heard from their constituents has made us even more eager to resume the fight next week on Capitol Hill.
Residents of Washington state are paying the third highest gas prices in the continental United States, according to AAA – trailing only Speaker Pelosi’s home state of California and Connecticut. Make no mistake; prices are soaring no matter where we drive our cars these days. Prices at the gas station in Ohio where my family usually fills up climbed above $4.00 per gallon over the last couple of weeks, but to see gas prices surge toward $4.40 in Seattle and Spokane really reinforced the depth of this crisis. And as you might expect, it dominated the conversations I had during my visit to the Northwest.
Those I spoke with in Bellevue, Spokane, and Pasco were really struck by the Democratic leadership’s consistent defiance of the American people on this issue. Poll after poll shows strong support for more energy production here in the United States in order to help lower gas prices. We have vast resources that can be explored in an environmentally-safe way in Alaska, the Rockies, and far off our coasts. And the American people overwhelmingly favor doing just that. Even self-described liberals, according to a Pew Research Center poll released earlier this week, are now moving in the direction of more American energy.
But the Democrats in charge of Congress are turning a deaf ear to these calls. While even a growing number of liberals now recognize the need for unlocking America’s natural energy resources, Democratic leaders are proving themselves to be to the Left of the Left. Indeed, Speaker Pelosi and her allies have been worshipping at the altar of radical environmentalism since well before I got to Congress back in 1991. Since then, the Speaker and I have had the opportunity to cast 46 votes to increase the production of American energy. I was proud to cast the “pro-energy” vote all 46 times. The Speaker, in contrast, did so all of two times.
The real ramifications of those votes never really came into focus until the past 18 months of Democratic control in Congress, during which gas prices have risen by a whopping 75 percent. But trust me, the impact of the Speaker’s votes and the Democratic Party’s year-after-year refusal to allow for more energy production on federal lands and far off our shores was completely evident to the men and women I met in Washington state earlier this week. I heard about families who were readjusting their travel plans. Vacations that were being reconsidered. And business owners who were forced to make difficult and seemingly impossible decisions because of the energy costs they are facing on a daily basis.
It doesn’t have to be this way. The fact is, our nation has ample resources to put more American oil and gas into our supply lines and show the rest of the world that we are serious about energy independence and lower gasoline prices. We had those resources over a decade ago too, when President Clinton was presented legislation that would have opened up a small patch of the arctic coastal plain for environmentally-safe oil exploration – exploration that would have put one million additional barrels of oil into the market today. But, just as the Democratic Congress is stonewalling more American energy today, so too did President Clinton block it – with his veto pen – back then.
Families and small businesses in Washington state and everywhere else are fed up. And they want action now. Americans have spoken loudly and clearly in support of more American energy production and lower gas prices. Now it is time for Congress to finally heed those calls.
Republicans will be at the forefront of this fight in the weeks to come, and I urge you to join us as well. Call your Members of Congress, and ask them to support the House GOP’s “all of the above” plan. This is a fight that will continue all summer long and into the fall until the Democrats relent and allow votes on meaningful energy solutions. But on behalf of all Americans struggling with high prices at the pump, it is a fight worth having.
By John Boehner
John Boehner is the Republican Minority Leader for the House of Representatives.
-
ken: disinformation. sen. obama doesn't advocate higher gas prices. sen. obama favors implementing and developing alternative fuels and energy. you may recall that gdubya, like many of the grand oil party who are deep into big oil's pockets, unless impeached or run out of d.c., will continue to use his veto power to favor old, retreaded solutions that harm the environment,poison our future, and only make us less capable.
-
Actually, Bill Clinton vetoed legislation that would have started drilling in ANWR around 15 years ago - we would have ~ one million barrels flowing today, otherwise.
What disinformation? I quoted almost exactly what Obama said, he didn't bemoan the high oil and gas prices but wished the "adjustment" had been more gradual. I did not say he "advocated" higher gas prices, though you could get that implication from his own words. Talk about misinformation, the same tired old B.S. blaming Bush and the evil Big Oil!
Does Obama have some secret technology for "implementing and developing alternative fuels and energy" overnight? I seriously doubt it. Politicians, Obama included, can scarecly get out of their own way.
The ethanol mandat congress passed has turned out to be a nightmare, driving up food prices world-wide and contributing nothing to the energy problem. It takes 1,700 gallons of water and one gallon of fossil fuel to produce one gallon of ethanol, and ethanol has approximately 70% of the energy of gasoline, so you get poorer mileage when you burn it, an emit more CO2! Does that sound efficient to you?
Pumping our own oil and becoming independent from the volatile Middle East is not an "old, retreaded" solution. It is one that is necessary and possible. There is no way we can immediately phase in alternative energy, even if it were available. There are approximately 40 million vehicles on our highways today, burning petroleum products, and not many peop...Actually, Bill Clinton vetoed legislation that would have started drilling in ANWR around 15 years ago - we would have ~ one million barrels flowing today, otherwise.
What disinformation? I quoted almost exactly what Obama said, he didn't bemoan the high oil and gas prices but wished the "adjustment" had been more gradual. I did not say he "advocated" higher gas prices, though you could get that implication from his own words. Talk about misinformation, the same tired old B.S. blaming Bush and the evil Big Oil!
Does Obama have some secret technology for "implementing and developing alternative fuels and energy" overnight? I seriously doubt it. Politicians, Obama included, can scarecly get out of their own way.
The ethanol mandat congress passed has turned out to be a nightmare, driving up food prices world-wide and contributing nothing to the energy problem. It takes 1,700 gallons of water and one gallon of fossil fuel to produce one gallon of ethanol, and ethanol has approximately 70% of the energy of gasoline, so you get poorer mileage when you burn it, an emit more CO2! Does that sound efficient to you?
Pumping our own oil and becoming independent from the volatile Middle East is not an "old, retreaded" solution. It is one that is necessary and possible. There is no way we can immediately phase in alternative energy, even if it were available. There are approximately 40 million vehicles on our highways today, burning petroleum products, and not many people I know can afford to immediately buy and altenative fuel vehicle, even if they were available.
Even when electric cars are viable, they will still require electricity to charge them - how is that going to be generated? Most of our electricity today is generated by coal, oil and natural gas, with some hydroelectric power in regions of the nation, and only around 17% from nuclear power. Contrast that with Europe, where France generates around 77% of its power from nuclear generators.
It turns out that one of the advanced batteries that the auto companies were counting on, lithium ion batteries, have a tendency to explode, and probably can't be used in autos unless the problem is corrected. As a result, the Chevy Volt, which GM is planning to bring out in 2010, will have a range of only 40 miles, before its small onboard engine starts up to recharge it.
What is going to replace heating oil and natural gas overnight for those who heat their homes with it? You need to try and see beyond your irrational hatred of Bush and look at real remedies. You tell us your solution, if you have one!
(less) -
Answered When they decide to listen to the citizens, I think...
I don't know if they will ever listen. The economy will not get any better until the price of oil goes down. This is simple economics, but I don't think there are many in the democratic party that even understand Americas economic system! I am quite sure obama doesn't. He doesn't even understand capital gains! -
Answered Why should they care, we taxpayers pay for their gas.
We should all be voicing our opinions where it counts....to our elected officials. Democrats are so stuck in the '70's. It is just fine with them that the Saudis are paying $.65 a gallon for gas but we are paying $4.00 a gallon because they won't drill at home to show them that we don't have to depend upon their foreign oil. We should be increasing the costs of all of our exports to them.....including food, since they are gouging us with gas costs. Democrats are also just fine with letting China drill towards Cuba and sapping our resources because we haven't heard one thing about that from the liberal media. -
Yes we should be voicing our opinions...but our opinions should contain facts. We only import 20% of our oil from the Middle East. Between 60-70% comes from North and South America....30% of that is domestic The other 10-20% comes from Great Britain and Africa.
-
Answered When they decide to listen to the citizens, I think...
We can safely blame both sides for the past but now it is the Dems holding back on drilling and a good solid energy plan. Sign every petition you can find to drill now - this dependence on the Middle East is insane.
http://www.americansolutions....
Call every elected official you have - get active. We can move this group of slugs. -
Answered When it is too late and the economy has collapsed.
It is already ten years to late. We do not even hear about the cars that actually run on just water for fuel.
Check it out
http://waterpoweredcar.com/st... -
Answered When they decide to listen to the citizens, I think...
Everyone can start by signing this petition.
http://www.americansolutions....
-
Answered When they decide to listen to the citizens, I think...
it will be because they have no choice. Drilling rigs are now safe. They don't leak or spill anymore. Only the far left loopies are against drilling. Even most Democrats are for it now. Imagine the explosion of the economy with gas prices cut in half and hundreds of thousands or maybe a million or more people getting good paying jobs drilling and refining. -
Answered When it is too late and the economy has collapsed.
Liberals are big on ideology but fall far short on practicality. They want to see everyone riding bicycles on the way to the forest to hug a tree. The only time they do anything is when they're forced to by circumstances, but they're to loony to realize that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. By the time they see how unatainable their utopiua is it will be too late to correct their selfdestructive mistakes. -
Answered When it is too late and the economy has collapsed.
This year is no exception for screwball politics, as one can see from the contorting, flip-flopping, and flat out lying, as Obammy and party attempt to take the White House. If McCain is interested in inhabiting the place, he'd better get to whacking away at his nemisis.
On our reserves: we should be developing what we have here, and there is plenty to develop be mined here before the five year period many liberals and greenies like to quote.
Here is a link for those interested in the scientific, rather than political reports for US Energy: http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oi...
Enjoy! -
Answered Why should they care, we taxpayers pay for their gas.
It's already too late and the U.S. economy is collapsing under the weight of $4.00+ a gallon gasoline and diesel. Nearly 70% of the U.S. population wants off shore drilling, drilling in ANWR and nuclear plants. I suggest we ALL vote out ANY politician who fails to do the public's bidding and votes to further the agendas of their puppet masters and lobbyists.
-
raves +10



Answered Why should they care, we taxpayers pay for their gas.
It's already too late and the U.S. economy is collapsing under the weight of $4.00+ a gallon gasoline and diesel. Nearly 70% of the U.S. population wants off shore drilling, drilling in ANWR and nuclear plants. I suggest we ALL vote out ANY politician who fails to do the public's bidding and votes to further the agendas of their puppet masters and lobbyists.