Question • What's Bubbling in Your Head?

Do Nuke plants look better to you now??

raves +22   by Bite Me (XSA) posted Jul 08, 2008 06:01PM GMTJuly 08, 2008 18:01:56
Do Nuke plants look better to you now??
  • No I like the fact that we are in trouble!
  • Yes they ar lookin good to me now!
  • I have a better plan!
Add Image Add Video
resize

* these fields are required to answer the question

I agree to the SodaHead TOS and Privacy

Loading Loading...
Top Comment
raves +8   by Dave posted Jul 08, 2008 06:09PM GMTJuly 08, 2008 18:09:15
Dave reply

Answered Yes they ar lookin good to me now!

They always have. There's one about 5 miles as a crow flies from here.
ar lookin 5 crow flies
view thread
Sort By: Raves | Date 1 2 3 4 ... Next » Last » Comments
  • raves +1   [-] by Republic of Honor posted Jul 27, 2008 10:47PM GMTJuly 27, 2008 22:47:17
    Republic of Honor reply

    Answered Yes they ar lookin good to me now!

    Always have been, they are so efficient! it is well worth it!
  • raves     [-] by wingslo posted Jul 17, 2008 07:43PM GMTJuly 17, 2008 19:43:55
    wingslo reply

    Answered I have a better plan!

    lets nuke saturn, they never did anything for us :P
  • raves     [-] by weeeee posted Jul 17, 2008 07:25PM GMTJuly 17, 2008 19:25:56
    weeeee reply

    Answered Undecided

    now compared to when?
  • raves     [-] by PETE WENTZ posted Jul 17, 2008 04:05AM GMTJuly 17, 2008 04:05:59
    PETE WENTZ reply

    Answered No I like the fact that we are in trouble!

    really i dont care
  • raves +1   [-] by Loreli posted Jul 17, 2008 03:46AM GMTJuly 17, 2008 03:46:02
    Loreli reply

    Answered Yes they ar lookin good to me now!

    Since the technology has improved so much since the 70's and 80's, I feel much more positive about them now. ar lookin technology improved 70s 80s feel positive
  • raves     [-] by THE CRONICK SMOKER posted Jul 17, 2008 03:30AM GMTJuly 17, 2008 03:30:49
    THE CRONICK SMOKER reply

    Answered I have a better plan!

    LOL THEY ALWAYS LOOK THE SAME EVERY SINGLE YEAR AND DAY THAT PASSES HAHA
  • raves     [-] by hannah montana posted Jul 17, 2008 02:54AM GMTJuly 17, 2008 02:54:24
    hannah montana reply

    Answered Undecided

    bc i dont care
  • raves +1   [-] by Ω Death is in love with gw... posted Jul 16, 2008 06:12PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 18:12:34
    Ω Death is in love with gwts Ω reply

    Answered None of the above

    Always has.
  • raves +2   [-] by Tracy posted Jul 16, 2008 06:02PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 18:02:21
    Tracy reply

    Answered Yes they ar lookin good to me now!

    Cleaner, more efficient, why is it the Liberals want to be globalists and like the Europeans but they balk at this? France, Germany, and other european nations are enjoying cleaner, cheaper energy. Again their hypocrisy know no bounds.
  • raves +1   [-] by Bill - NObama posted Jul 16, 2008 03:52PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 15:52:52
    SodaHead is online! Bill - NObama reply

    Answered None of the above

    they always have...
  • raves +1   [-] by HallofFame posted Jul 16, 2008 03:09PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 15:09:55
    HallofFame reply

    Answered Yes they ar lookin good to me now!

    Nuclear power is the future. The ad on this page says clean coal. We can do all.
  • raves     [-] by *Erin*Halli* posted Jul 16, 2008 02:07PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 14:07:33
    *Erin*Halli* reply

    Answered None of the above

    Personally I dislike pollution
  • raves     [-] by Bite Me (XSA) posted Jul 16, 2008 09:11PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 21:11:30
    Bite Me (XSA) reply
    So why not get rid of the coal burning plants?
  • raves +1   [-] by *Erin*Halli* posted Jul 17, 2008 02:05PM GMTJuly 17, 2008 14:05:51
    *Erin*Halli* reply
    YEA
  • raves +1   [-] by Florida Keys posted Jul 16, 2008 08:50AM GMTJuly 16, 2008 08:50:28
    Florida Keys reply

    Answered Yes they ar lookin good to me now!

    Yes, unless they become the primary target of terrorism
  • raves +2   [-] by Bite Me (XSA) posted Jul 16, 2008 10:31AM GMTJuly 16, 2008 10:31:16
    Bite Me (XSA) reply
    I cant see how that is a factor? Have you ever worked in one? You cant even go take a piss without an escort!
  • raves +1   [-] by Violet posted Jul 16, 2008 11:51AM GMTJuly 16, 2008 11:51:08 (edited)
    Violet reply
    Actually, that is a question I would ask as well. What would happen if they were targeted from the air or blasted with a rocket launcher?
  • raves +1   [-] by Bite Me (XSA) posted Jul 16, 2008 11:54AM GMTJuly 16, 2008 11:54:09
    Bite Me (XSA) reply
    Rockets couldnt get threw the concrete and steel. The weapons that could are owned by countries and not the terrorist. Iran will soon be able to do it.
  • raves +1   [-] by Violet posted Jul 16, 2008 12:01PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 12:01:01
    Violet reply
    This is a great poll. Though the idea of Iran owning such a weapon is frightening, I'm starting to see the value here. Thanks for helping me get my brain in gear this morning - I look forward to actually doing some digging on the subject.
  • raves +2   [-] by PigsOnSoma posted Jul 16, 2008 03:20PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 15:20:30
    PigsOnSoma reply
    My brother is a nuclear plant inspector - he oversees construction and operations - and at every stage they're in there on average of every three months.

    To worry about are the Russian plants - RBMK reactor types - Chernobyl was one. For one thing they won't submit to regular inspections, and for another they're containment is wanting. There are 15 or so in operation.


    This is a good site for nuclear energy facts.

    http://www.world-nuclear.org/...
  • raves +2   [-] by Bite Me (XSA) posted Jul 16, 2008 09:12PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 21:12:37
    Bite Me (XSA) reply
    Thanks for your input!
  • raves +2   [-] by PigsOnSoma posted Jul 16, 2008 09:26PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 21:26:55
    PigsOnSoma reply
    Sure, am happy to.
  • raves +1   [-] by Florida Keys posted Jul 16, 2008 11:19PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 23:19:26
    Florida Keys reply
    No...I have not....But that is good...Did you?
  • raves +1   [-] by Bite Me (XSA) posted Jul 16, 2008 11:21PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 23:21:21
    Bite Me (XSA) reply
    Several! Even the Savanna River Plant.
  • raves +1   [-] by Florida Keys posted Jul 16, 2008 11:23PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 23:23:39
    Florida Keys reply
    That would be interesting....
  • raves +1   [-] by Bite Me (XSA) posted Jul 16, 2008 11:25PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 23:25:30
    Bite Me (XSA) reply
    Na its a pain in the ass!
  • raves +2   [-] by fred posted Jul 16, 2008 07:20AM GMTJuly 16, 2008 07:20:45
    fred reply

    Answered Yes they ar lookin good to me now!

    They always looked good to me. But then I'm not afraid of good science.
  • raves +1   [-] by Violet posted Jul 16, 2008 03:52AM GMTJuly 16, 2008 03:52:07
    Violet reply

    Answered Undecided

    I remember Chernobyl.
  • raves +1   [-] by Bite Me (XSA) posted Jul 16, 2008 10:35AM GMTJuly 16, 2008 10:35:03
    Bite Me (XSA) reply
    That was one of the first and they dont build like that anymore! Our navy has many reactors with now problems.
  • raves +2   [-] by Violet posted Jul 16, 2008 11:48AM GMTJuly 16, 2008 11:48:55
    Violet reply
    Good to know. I know zilch about nuclear power so I can't form an opinion until I educate myself on the subject - hence the "undecided". My views are admittedly based on emotion and not fact. Thanks for the info.
  • raves +3   [-] by Evan posted Jul 16, 2008 02:36AM GMTJuly 16, 2008 02:36:45
    Evan reply

    Answered Yes they ar lookin good to me now!

    I think the introduction of nuclear power plants were just ahead of their time. They are the SAFEST way to produce power and as long as the government helps with security, I think nuclear power plants can do some real good. Imagine if we had nuclear powered cars or nuclear generators to power single houses
  • raves +1   [-] by Violet posted Jul 16, 2008 12:16PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 12:16:18
    Violet reply
    Hey Evan, I have a question for you. By government helping with security, do you mean the armed forces? Can you please explain why that would be better than a private contractor supplying security?
  • raves +2