Aug 03, 2008 12:32AM GMT
Question
•
Science - Environmental
Is Climate Change Racist?
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/is-climate-change-racist/"Liberals know the best way to get black people interested in a political issue: to racialize it and couch it in language like “equity” and “social justice,” and push for yet more government programs. That’s why reports like 'A Climate of Change: African Americans, Global Warming, and a Just Climate Policy in the U.S.' are written.
On Tuesday, liberal Congressman James Clyburn spoke at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., to kick off the Environmental Justice and Climate Change Initiative, sponsored by the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. The left-leaning think tank created the Commission to Engage African-Americans on Climate Change to encourage blacks to join the global warming debate.
“It is critical our community be an integral and active part of the debate because African Americans are disproportionately impacted by the effects of climate change economically, socially and through our health and well-being,” Clyburn said."
-
raves +4 Aug 04, 2008 03:12PM GMTThat is so not true!
The Presidents job is to keep the country safe from harm. How in the hell does anyone battle "Mother Nature"?
Why don't you read up a little more on what really happened. When the storm was coming the Mayor of New Orleans could of evacuated those people out and didn't. It is true that shit rolls down hill and it did all the way to Bush....But it starts with the Mayor then the governor and then FEMA.
More AMERICANS pulled together to help the people of New Orleans and if you research you will see that AMERICANS are still helping out down there.
This is what we stand for...helping each other in need...not sitting on our FAT ASSES complaining about what the government didn't give us for FREE! -
raves +3 Aug 04, 2008 03:16PM GMTGeorge Bush and the federal government are not to blame for the disaster we have witnessed in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
In fact, the primary responsibility for the disaster response lies with New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin, Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco and other local officials.
Yet leading Democrats and their allies in the major media are clearly using this disaster for political purposes and ignoring one obvious fact.
This fact – which needs to be repeated and remembered – is that in our country, state and local governments have primary responsibility in dealing with local disasters.
The founding fathers devised a federal system of government – one that has served us remarkably well through great disasters that have befallen America over more than two centuries.
But if we believe the major TV networks, George Bush, FEMA and the Republicans in Congress are all to blame for the current nightmare.
Let's remember that FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, was created only in 1979. It was formed to coordinate and focus federal response to major disasters – to "assist" local and state governments.
Common sense suggests that local and state governments are best able to prepare and plan for local disasters.
Is...George Bush and the federal government are not to blame for the disaster we have witnessed in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
In fact, the primary responsibility for the disaster response lies with New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin, Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco and other local officials.
Yet leading Democrats and their allies in the major media are clearly using this disaster for political purposes and ignoring one obvious fact.
This fact – which needs to be repeated and remembered – is that in our country, state and local governments have primary responsibility in dealing with local disasters.
The founding fathers devised a federal system of government – one that has served us remarkably well through great disasters that have befallen America over more than two centuries.
But if we believe the major TV networks, George Bush, FEMA and the Republicans in Congress are all to blame for the current nightmare.
Let's remember that FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, was created only in 1979. It was formed to coordinate and focus federal response to major disasters – to "assist" local and state governments.
Common sense suggests that local and state governments are best able to prepare and plan for local disasters.
Is a Washington bureaucrat better suited to prepare for an earthquake in San Francisco, a hurricane in Florida, or a terrorist act in New York?
After the Sept. 11 attacks against the World Trade Center, no one suggested that the Bush administration should have been responsible for New York's disaster response or that federal agents should have been involved in the rescue of those trapped in the buildings.
Last year, four major hurricanes slammed into Florida. Governor Jeb Bush led the disaster response and did a remarkable job, with nothing happening like what we have seen in New Orleans.
The primary response in disasters has always come from local communities and state governments.
First responders and the manpower to deal with emergencies come from local communities: police, fire and medical. Under our federal system, these local departments answer to local authorities, not those in Washington. These first responders are not even under federal control, nor do they have to follow federal orders.
In addition to local responders, every state in the Union has a National Guard.
State National Guards answer first to the governor of each state, not to the president. The National Guard exists not to defend one state from an invasion by another state, but primarily for emergencies like the one we have witnessed in New Orleans and in other areas impacted by Katrina. (See: http://www.arng.army.mil/abou...
The media would have you believe that this disaster was worsened by a slow response from President Bush and his administration, though the primary responsibility for disaster response has always been with local and state governments.
It is true that federal response was not as fast as it could have been. The president himself has acknowledged that fact.
But the press has focused on the first 48 hours of federal response, not uttering a word about the fact that New Orleans had 48 hours of warning that a major Category 4 or 5 would make landfall near the city, yet local officials apparently did little to prepare.
Obviously, Gov. Blanco did not effectively deploy her state's National Guard.
And New Orleans' city leaders did almost nothing to evacuate the portion of the population with no transportation. In failing to follow their own evacuation plan, these officials did little to pre-position food, water and personnel to deal with the aftermath.
I was surprised Sunday to watch Tim Russert, on his show "Meet the Press," tear into Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff. During his encounter with Chertoff, Russert did not suggest once that local government had any role in dealing with the disaster. Russert also asked for Chertoff's resignation.
It wasn't until after the first 29 minutes of his show – 29 minutes – that Russert raised the question of local responsibility. And when he did so with Jefferson Parish President Aaron Broussard, he did so in a passing way. Broussard brushed off his question with a non-answer.
Broussard began his interview claiming that the nation had "abandoned" New Orleans.
That is nonsense and a lie.
Broussard, who was never identified by "Meet the Press" as a Democrat, spent much of his time attacking the Bush administration, as has Democratic New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin.
Broussard then ended his performance as he collapsed in tears with a demand: "For God's sake, just shut up and send us somebody!"
His tears didn't wash with me. My sympathies lie with the tens of thousands of people who have suffered or died because local officials like Broussard, Mayor Nagin and Governor Kathleen Blanco, also a Democrat, failed monumentally at their jobs.
As former New Orleans Mayor Marc Morial told Russert, the disaster in New Orleans was "foreseeable."
In fact, New Orleans has long known that such a disaster could take place if a major hurricane hit the city.
The municipality even prepared its own "City of New Orleans Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan."
The plan makes it evident that New Orleans knew that evacuation of the civilian population was the primary responsibility of the city – not the federal government.
The city plan acknowledges its responsibility in the document:
As established by the City of New Orleans Charter, the government has jurisdiction and responsibility in disaster response. City government shall coordinate its efforts through the Office of Emergency Preparedness.
The city document also makes clear that decisions involving a proper and orderly evacuation lie with the governor, mayor and local authorities. Nowhere is the president or federal government even mentioned:
The authority to order the evacuation of residents threatened by an approaching hurricane is conferred to the Governor by Louisiana Statute. The Governor is granted the power to direct and compel the evacuation of all or part of the population from a stricken or threatened area within the State, if he deems this action necessary for the preservation of life or other disaster mitigation, response or recovery. The same power to order an evacuation conferred upon the Governor is also delegated to each political subdivision of the State by Executive Order. This authority empowers the chief elected official of New Orleans, the Mayor of New Orleans, to order the evacuation of the parish residents threatened by an approaching hurricane.
It is clear the city also recognized that it would need to move large portions of its population, and it would need to prepare for such an eventuality:
The City of New Orleans will utilize all available resources to quickly and safely evacuate threatened areas. Those evacuated will be directed to temporary sheltering and feeding facilities as needed. When specific routes of progress are required, evacuees will be directed to those routes. Special arrangements will be made to evacuate persons unable to transport themselves or who require specific life saving assistance. Additional personnel will be recruited to assist in evacuation procedures as needed. ...
Evacuation procedures for small scale and localized evacuations are conducted per the SOPs of the New Orleans Fire Department and the New Orleans Police Department. However, due to the sheer size and number of persons to be evacuated, should a major tropical weather system or other catastrophic event threaten or impact the area, specifically directed long range planning and coordination of resources and responsibilities efforts must be undertaken. [You can read New Orleans' Emergency Plan for hurricanes at its Web site: http://www.cityofno.com/porta...
The city's plan also specifically called for the use of city-owned buses and school buses to evacuate the population. These were apparently never deployed, though the Parish of Plaquemines just south of the city evacuated its population using school buses.
The plan, written well before Katrina was even a teardrop in God's eye, was obviously never heeded or implemented by local leaders.
But why should the New Orleans mayor and Governor Blanco take responsibility when they can blame George Bush and the Republicans in Washington?
With congressional elections fast approaching, Democrats who are out of power in every branch of the federal government know they need to change the tide quickly.
They have apparently seized on the Katrina disaster to harm the president politically.
Criticism of the federal government's response is fair and warranted. But putting full responsibility for this disaster on the Bush administration is way over the top.
Primary responsibility for this disaster remains with local officials like Nagin and Blanco, not President Bush.(less) -
raves +2 Aug 15, 2008 02:55PM GMTThat my dear is just an opinion!
I'm not rich very far from it!
Yes I am white, italian, irish, german, dutch, indian and married polish, I concider myself "All American".
I have a lot of conservative friends and family that are NOT RICH, just work for a living.
No one in my group of family & friends lives off welfare or cheats the system; that was set up to temporaily help the needy.
What most of us believe in core morals and values which this country was based on.
What is it EXACTLY that Bush could have done more?
In any other "Natural Disaster" we have NOT heard people complain about the government than we heard with Katrina in New Orleans...Yet, people from all over this country are still pitching in to help out?
Where are the people that lived there their whole lives?
The way I see it....they were all given money by the US government and given places to say. Some just left and went to other cities...a lot of those people were living in poverty...this tells me most of them didn't own the properties they were living in.
Where are they??
Now that would be an interesting "Lets find out"?? -
raves +1 Aug 15, 2008 06:54PM GMT (edited)Yep! That happens when mother nature isn't racist!
Alot of people can't afford to build new homes....just because they couldn't or didn't have flood insurance living in a "flood zone" doesn't mean the government needs to put everyone up in a palace for the rest of their lives?
The ones that DIED, died because they had no way to get out of harms way. It was up to the Mayor Ray Nagin /Governor Blanco to help evacuate their people...Ask them why they didn't get the busses rolling??
I feel bad for the Mayor of New Orleans...he has a lot of blame on his shoulders and life isn't easy for him... But I'll remind you of the Billions that were sent to New Orleans and the help they are still getting and people are still complaining. American's help American's but some just have to learn to help themselves not depend on a hand out.
I see the city building up but what if another Katrina comes along...what do you think these tents under a bridge are going to do? Is this just a place for the homeless to go?
http://www.wwltv.com/video/ne...
http://www.laughatliberals.co...
To say that GWB could have done more is LAME!
Read some of this and do research!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
PS>>>>IF YOU DON'T TAKE THE TIME TO READ AND LISTEN TO WHAT I'VE POSTED HERE THEN DON'T RESPOND. I DON'T WANT TO BE MIS UNDERSTOOD! -
raves +1 Aug 24, 2008 03:47PM GMTThat is NOT true either!
http://fora.tv/2006/07/20/Pre...
-
raves +2 Aug 24, 2008 03:52PM GMTHe said this over the Katrina issue?
Mother Freakin Nature is GW Bush's fault....give it up!
It was the Mayor/Governors fault...they knew the levies could break if they ever got hit with a storm that size...why didn't they do anything to fix them before it happened?
Get real already.....!!!! -
raves Aug 29, 2008 04:20PM GMTAnd here comes another hurricane that could hit them...I'm giving Bobby Jindal (Governor) kudos for expressing how important it is to head the warnings. Un like the last time when they did nothing under the past governor (Kathleen Blanco) Mayor of the Chocolate City and didn't do more to get those people out of harms way!
I'm just curious how the Mayor of New Orleans will handle it this time if his city gets hit?
http://www.bayoubuzz.com/News...


Answered No
The idea is as absurd as the notion of man-made global warming.