Question • TV

Is it raciest to think that there should be a W.E.T or a H.E.T. since there is a B.E.T?

raves +1   by Pimpjuice posted Aug 29, 2007 10:41PM GMTAugust 29, 2007 22:41:31
Is it raciest to think that there should be a W.E.T or a H.E.T. since there is a B.E.T?
Add Image Add Video
resize

* these fields are required to comment

I agree to the SodaHead TOS and Privacy

Loading Loading...
Sort By: Raves | Date Comments
  • raves     [-] by Derek posted Aug 31, 2007 05:11AM GMTAugust 31, 2007 05:11:18
    Derek reply

    Answered No

    Not racist, just not well thought out. We do have white networks. It's called "almost every other channel."
  • raves     [-] by Lalo posted Aug 30, 2007 12:59AM GMTAugust 30, 2007 00:59:35
    Lalo reply

    Answered No

    nahh its just a channel there are many...but im guessing u mean the actual letters? but it is what it is......hispanics got telemundo....n i guess thats it....n well W.E.T. haha well they have NBC ABC CBS.... so yeah
  • raves     [-] by Mike posted Aug 30, 2007 12:06AM GMTAugust 30, 2007 00:06:17 (edited)
    Mike reply

    Answered Yes

    Just because there is a B.E.T. does not mean it is right to have a W.E.T., H.E.T., or any other race spacific channel. I believe it would seperate the races more. It is the seperate channels, radio stations, and benifits specified for particular races that keep racism going. The actors should not want to be grouped into catagories by ethnicity. There are great actors and directors in all ethnicities. It all depends on why you think there should be one.
  • raves     [-] by Matt posted Aug 30, 2007 12:03AM GMTAugust 30, 2007 00:03:47
    Matt reply

    Answered No

    Not really. I'm sure that african-americans made B.E.T. so its up to the whites and the hispanics to make their own.
  • raves     [-] by the vin-man posted Aug 29, 2007 11:49PM GMTAugust 29, 2007 23:49:52
    the vin-man reply

    Answered No

    No not at all. Whats good for the goose is good for the gander.
  • raves   -1 [-] by ronnie posted Aug 29, 2007 11:30PM GMTAugust 29, 2007 23:30:11
    ronnie reply

    Answered No

    I have always felt that it is racist on the part of the black community to have a B.E.T. and would have a fit if we had a W.E.T. or a H.E.T. They fought to be made full partners of this society and now they want their own network and their own Ms. Black America and who knows what else. But, if we try to have just a Miss White America, look out!! They will be up in arms and we will have to listent to that idiot Jackson and his puppet, Sharpton. Am I being racist? I don't think so!!! I am just stating the fact that the black people demanded equality. They got it and now look at what they do, have separate networks for blacks, but let us try that and oh boy are we in for it!!! If we are trying for equality, then let's have equality-----IN EVERYTHING!!!!!
  • raves +1   [-] by Regulus [99 - INSHALLAH] posted Aug 29, 2007 10:55PM GMTAugust 29, 2007 22:55:28
    Regulus [99 - INSHALLAH] reply

    Answered Undecided

    There already is-it's called FOX, lol
  • raves   -2 [-] by ronnie posted Aug 29, 2007 11:32PM GMTAugust 29, 2007 23:32:55
    ronnie reply
    FOX is not a racial network, but then again, you have to put your liberal agenda out there as always.
  • raves +1 -1 [-] by lonewolf posted Aug 29, 2007 10:44PM GMTAugust 29, 2007 22:44:46
    lonewolf reply

    Answered No

    enough with the race stuff.
  • raves     [-] by Derek posted Aug 31, 2007 05:09AM GMTAugust 31, 2007 05:09:51
    Derek reply
    Ignorance is bliss.
  • raves +1   [-] by Pimpjuice posted Aug 29, 2007 10:43PM GMTAugust 29, 2007 22:43:14
    Pimpjuice reply

    Answered No

    Why would it be raciest to have white entertainment television if there is black entertainment television?
  • raves     [-] by ronnie posted Aug 29, 2007 11:31PM GMTAugust 29, 2007 23:31:50
    ronnie reply
    Great question pimpjuice. Maybe someone will answer that for us...
Author
Answers
Comments
17
12
Pimpjuice

Ask a related question!