Sep 08, 2008 12:56PM GMTSeptember 08, 2008 12:56:06

Question Stats

65 answers
134 comments
raves +11  
Share This Question

MSNBC Drops Olbermann, Matthews as News Anchors?

By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, September 8, 2008; Page C01

MSNBC is removing Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews as the anchors of live political events, bowing to growing criticism that they are too opinionated to be seen as neutral in the heat of the presidential campaign.

MSNBC Drops Olbermann, Matthews as News Anchors
Monday, Sept. 8 at noon ET: Critiquing the Press
David Gregory, the NBC newsman and White House correspondent who also hosts a program on MSNBC, will take over during such events as this fall's presidential and vice presidential debates and election night.

The move, confirmed by spokesmen for both networks, follows increasingly loud complaints about Olbermann's anchor role at the Democratic and Republican conventions. Olbermann, who regularly assails President Bush and GOP nominee John McCain on his "Countdown" program, was effusive in praising the acceptance speech of Democratic nominee Barack Obama. He drew flak Thursday when the Republicans played a video that included a tribute to the victims of the Sept. 11 attacks, saying that if the networks had done that, "we would be rightly eviscerated at all quarters, perhaps by the Republican Party itself, for exploiting the memories of the dead, and perhaps even for trying to evoke that pain again. If you reacted to that videotape the way I did, I apologize."


Matthews, who has criticized politicians in both parties, drew less criticism for his convention role but became a divisive figure during the primaries when he described how he was inspired by Obama's speeches and made disparaging remarks about Hillary Clinton, for which he later apologized.

In May, MSNBC President Phil Griffin said in an interview that during live events Olbermann and Matthews "put on different hats. I think the audience gets it. . . . I see zero problem."

But NBC News journalists, who often appear on the cable channel, did see a problem, arguing behind the scenes that MSNBC's move to the left -- which includes a new show, debuting tonight, for Air America radio host Rachel Maddow -- was tarnishing their reputation for fairness. Tom Brokaw, the interim host of "Meet the Press," said that at times Olbermann and Matthews went too far.

Olbermann and Matthews will remain as analysts during major political events, and officials at both networks, who declined to be identified discussing personnel moves, said Olbermann had initiated the discussions to clarify his role. They said Olbermann's influence at MSNBC would in no way be diminished and that the shift would enable him and Matthews to offer more candid analysis during live coverage. Olbermann confirmed yesterday he had initiated the discussions.

"Phil and I have debated this set-up since late winter/early spring (with me saying, 'Are you sure this flies?' and him saying, 'Yes, but let's judge it event by event') and I think we both reached the same point during the RNC," Olbermann said by e-mail.

Olbermann was involved in several on-air incidents during the conventions that drew unwanted attention. He told morning host Joe Scarborough, a former Republican congressman, to "get a shovel" as Scarborough was defending the McCain campaign. And when GOP strategist Mike Murphy was debating Matthews, Olbermann could be heard saying, "Let's wrap him up."

These and other clashes fueled a sense that conservative voices are less than welcome at MSNBC as it has tried to position itself as a left-wing alternative to Fox News Channel. Olbermann disputes this view, calling the incidents "overblown." Still, the network canceled Tucker Carlson's show in March and has diminished his role. And Dan Abrams, the veteran NBC legal analyst and former MSNBC general manager, had his program dropped last month to make room for Maddow, an Olbermann protege.

MSNBC's more liberal outlook has boosted its ratings, though it remains the third-place cable news channel. But both parties began castigating its coverage last spring. Steve Schmidt, McCain's top strategist, called the network "an organ of the Democratic National Committee," and Clinton campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe said Matthews was "in the tank" for Obama.
Add Image Add Video
resize
Loading Loading...
Top Comment
raves +9   by Morris

Answered BOUT TIME

Watch them take paying jobs with Obama's campaign after all they have been doing the heavy lifting all along...

Hell Olbermann has all but profeced his love for Obama amd Matthews get chills running down his legs. I think their wives may have some whole new issues to deal with???
view thread
Sort By: Raves | Date 1 2 3 4 Next » Last » Comments
  • raves     [-] by AerialRach

    Answered OH NOOOO

    That's ridculous--Conservatives have Fox Noise; we should get to have our MSNBC. We'll just have to get them back somehow....we'll have to write letters, petition, etc.
  • raves     [-] by BlueStar Mom

    Answered None of the above

    In case you hadn't noticed... they are still there.
  • raves     [-] by pigpen2917

    Answered OH NOOOO

    Wow this is a sad day for America. Losing two of the best tv personalities will take along time to get over and I may just quit watching tv all together!
  • raves     [-] Is that a real question? replied to pigpen2917
    moderated...
  • raves +1   [-] by pet713~McCain, proud of it!

    Answered BOUT TIME

    But this will not be the last we hear from these jerks. I am glad their off this new cable, though. Even though I never watch it, anymore, because of the way they treated Hillary.
  • raves +2   [-] by 1sbwa

    Answered BOUT TIME

    More and more we ask for the facts. What we get is buried in bull.
    Worse let it is past on as fact without checking'
    So now you got everybody twisting the truth. And fighting for it as well.
    Of course you have those who only put out what they want and telling the truth does you know good at all.
    Reporters are to give us as much of the facts from all sides.We have more than 2 parties. But even the news stuffs the 2 parties down us. and say pick the lesser of the evils. And then they now even want to tell us who to vote for and what we should and should not take into account about who is running. This time it seems that the news people are for Obama. He has had no need to tell us much because the news people have been doing it for him. And those who did not he avoided.
    I think it is time for the news to get back to their jobs or loose them .
  • raves +4   [-] by GypsyRose

    Answered BOUT TIME

    MSNBC has some shows that I really like to watch, however.... I had stopped watching the entire channel due to things such as this. I had gotten to the point where it made me mad just to look at Olbermann. They can like whomever they want, its a free country. I just got tired of their views being shoved down my throat and being unable to hear anything remotely close to unbiased coverage of events.

    Interestingly enough, both of these two probably fall into the category that Obama wants to tax to death. Wonder if they'll still love them if in the end, they have to give him half their pay checks to fund God only knows what.
  • raves +4   [-] by maximus

    Answered BOUT TIME

    Report the F**king news not your personal views!!
  • raves +5   [-] by Backlashjack

    Answered I THINK

    It is still a liberal news station. ABC, NBC, CBS,etc main stream media will remain liberal. Fox seems fair but for all REAL news and conservative commentary,(Which they separate) is found on AM radio. Rush, Medved, Ingrham, Dennis Miller and many more.
  • raves +2   [-] by smp

    Answered I THINK

    These guys are only entertainment. As soon as they started taking themselves seriously so did all five of their viewers. When they lost four the network had to do something.
  • raves +1   [-] by Crank_It_Up

    Answered None of the above

    after hearing such one sided rants all day on talk radio and fox news, it was refreshing to occasionally hear the other side for a change.
  • raves +1   [-] GypsyRose replied to Crank_It_Up
    With all due respect, I don't think you understand the definition of "one-sided".
  • raves +5   [-] by SwissM

    Answered BOUT TIME

    I seriously thought they were going to orgasm on television after Obama's speech. With them gone now NBC will be 70% in the tank for Obama instead of 100%. Maybe CNN, CBS, and NBC should follow suit.
  • raves +3   [-] by candy "The Original"

    Answered OH NOOOO

    K.O. IS MY MAIN MAN..... noooo main
  • raves +1   [-] Chuck - NEVER SO PROUD replied to candy "The Original"
    Yes he is!
  • raves +4   [-] SwissM replied to Chuck - NEVER SO PROUD
    The guy is a bone head. he should be working directly for the Obama campaign. actually, he probably is!
  • raves     [-] Is that a real question? replied to candy "The Original"
    moderated...
  • raves +5   [-] by JnMO

    Answered BOUT TIME

    Are they (olbermann & matthews) really journalists? They are more like a paid endorser than a journalist.
  • raves +1   [-] atmer replied to JnMO
    Kinda' like O'Rilley, Hannity, Combs, etc, etc, etc?
  • raves     [-] waldvogel1 replied to atmer
    Great answer!
  • raves     [-] Is that a real question? replied to atmer
    moderated...
  • raves +1   [-] Is that a real question? replied to JnMO
    moderated...
  • raves     [-] atmer replied to Is that a real question?
    It's only because there are more NON thinkers that watch TV and pick Faux "News". Ruppert Murdock is a well known right wing shill... as are all of his so called 'reporters'.
  • raves +2   [-] by Studied

    Answered BOUT TIME

    I expect my new journalists to be true journalists, not part of a biased political agenda. These two made no appology for the unfair way they were reporting on Obama. Actually they were not reporting and these folks STILL have not asked any questions regarding Rezko or Obama's long list of radical friends and supporters.
  • raves +4   [-] by hurricanf~No-B.O,B.A,J.W,Acorn

    Answered WOW

    The group called ‘The New Agenda’ was heavily involved with getting them fired. The New Agenda is a women’s group.
  • raves +4   [-] harrisa replied to hurricanf~No-B.O,B.A,J.W,Acorn
    I hope they go to work on Campbell Brown. She is so biased it is pathetic, particularly against the women i.e. Hillary and Palin. Its like she thinks she is the only woman who should be able to get ahead.
  • raves +2   [-] hurricanf~No-B.O,B.A,J.W,Acorn replied to harrisa
    Apparently this is a group of high powered women that is not going to let things slide anymore so we shall see.
  • raves +3   [-] GypsyRose replied to harrisa
    Campbell Brown makes me sick. Think I'll look up that women's group. If they had anything to do with getting the demotions for those two morons, I may want to join.
  • raves +2   [-] harrisa replied to GypsyRose
    I was thinking the same thing. I just can't stand to watch the news that much anymore.
  • raves     [-] Is that a real question? replied to harrisa
    moderated...
  • raves     [-] harrisa replied to Is that a real question?