Question • U.S. Government

Do you think we should either finish the job in Iraq with relentless full force attacking or get out?

raves +12 -2 by Jerry posted Sep 21, 2007 07:57PM GMT

Why even be there if we're holding back ? If our government won't let the soldiers do the job right shouldn't they come home.Our politicians on both sides of the isle don't care about right and wrong. They disagree with each other on everything ,as if they're mindless.

Share this Question
Grab this Widget
Answers
Results
Who Answered?

Comment

Add Image Add Video

resize

* these fields are required to comment

* Nick Name

* Email

* Password

Gender

Male
Female

Birthdate

I agree to the SodaHead TOS and Privacy

Top Comment

raves +8 by Jamie (goofygirl) posted May 29, 2008 01:18PM GMT

Answered Yes

They want stability and it took us from 1783 until 1787 to get it together, and we did not have quite the civil unrest or the population of Iraq. I think the people of Iraq want a better government, I am not stating they want a Western government, but the dictatorship has proven deadly for everyone.

view thread

Sort By: Raves | Date «« First « Prev 1 2 3 4 Comments

raves +1 -2 [-] by HIMfanaticShannon posted May 29, 2008 04:59AM GMTMay 29, 2008 04:59:09

reply

Answered Yes
I think we should leave. If they wanna kill all the terrorists and are that scared then just bomb the whole place to hell and leave. Either way just get out.
raves +2 [-] by Kodabear posted May 29, 2008 04:58AM GMTMay 29, 2008 04:58:41

reply

Answered No
War is never the answer, just end it already plz.
raves +5 [-] by JKING720 posted May 29, 2008 04:54AM GMTMay 29, 2008 04:54:45

reply

Answered No
Just because we were made a fool of by you know... who doesnt mean we have to stay being a fool ! Bring our troops and our tax dollars home where there really needed.
raves +3 [-] by Jerry posted May 29, 2008 04:57AM GMTMay 29, 2008 04:57:57

reply
Bringing the troops home is one of the choices. If you're going to fight , fight to win or don't fight at all is my point.
raves +2 [-] by Breeze posted Jun 04, 2008 09:30AM GMTJune 04, 2008 09:30:06

reply
this garners a rave times ten.
raves +1 [-] by Breeze posted Jun 04, 2008 09:29AM GMTJune 04, 2008 09:29:07

reply
for the lords sake, please read a history book. Then stop and reflect on the sacrifice made by those above.
raves +4 [-] by Timmaaaaaay posted May 29, 2008 04:53AM GMTMay 29, 2008 04:53:05

reply

Answered Yes
absolutely, there is no way to "sort of " fight a war. Either be at war, or make peace, and if you are at war fight, like you wanna win.
raves +3 [-] by RightWingDog - NOBAMA posted May 29, 2008 04:46AM GMTMay 29, 2008 04:46:09

reply

Answered Yes
Yes, I think we have played to game of "corret warfare" long enough. We should take them out as they want to do to us.

RWD
raves +4 [-] by Tpem posted May 29, 2008 04:43AM GMTMay 29, 2008 04:43:30 (edited)

reply

Answered Yes
I think liberals have always handcuffed our military and kept us from fighting the war all out to win. The liberals don't want anyone hurt. Politically they cripple our military through media pressure. Well in war people get hurt. If our military is not allowed to fight to win they are at risk and have no reason to be there. Cut them loose and this thing is over in a week.
raves +3 [-] by Nikki posted May 26, 2008 06:38PM GMTMay 26, 2008 18:38:32 (edited)

reply

Answered Yes
Wipe them off the map. It will end terrorism. Then our brave soldiers could come home.
raves +2 [-] by Damaged_Rebirth posted May 29, 2008 04:53AM GMTMay 29, 2008 04:53:02 (edited)

reply
Terrorism is worldwide, not just in the middle east.
raves +3 [-] by Scott posted Sep 21, 2007 09:07PM GMTSeptember 21, 2007 21:07:52

reply

Answered Yes
I am starting to ask, "is there an actual "job" there we can finish?" will throwing more money and soldiers at it get it done or do the Iraqi people need to decide that they want stability?