Question
•
General Government, Politics & Law
-
Answered No. This is typical politics,not plagiarism.
The end is near .... her own words aren't getting the votes... maybe someone else's will ... she also used Bill's finger pointing trick while lying about Obama's flyers not being honest on her backing of NAFTA..... she either doesn't read or write her own books.... she herself in her book said she backs NAFTA all the way (as passed by Bill Clinton).... until she got to Ohio where they blame NAFTA for a lot of their job loss, and she needs their vote now, so deny, deny, deny -
Answered Undecided
If she is going to use other peoples words she should say so since she was fussing about Obama. I think they all use parts of other people's speeches that they use. That is life. I am sure that normal people have done the same thing and not given the credit to the person that said it originally. She is running scared so she is willing to do what it takes to win. -
Answered No. This is typical politics,not plagiarism.
It's not only plagiarism of Edwards, but her hubby also said it during his administration. I honestly don't see anything wrong with this, it would be very difficult not to do this with all the talking they have to do. Just don't he hypocritical about it. -
Answered Undecided
Nope.
Everybody does it. That stuff is not really a big deal and only idiots would be concerned with such small things.
Who the hell cares!!!!
We have real issues going on in this world.
When one of them physically steals someone's property then we have something to worry about.
-
Answered No. This is typical politics,not plagiarism.
Just as Obama's authorized use of his friend's words were not plagiarism, neither is this. All politicians borrow words from each other. Can we get off this utterly stupid attack on common political speech practices? Anyone with any background knows this kind of thing has been going on forever. -
Answered No. This is typical politics,not plagiarism.
No she seemed like she wanted to show Edwards that she knew what he was saying in the background. She's working for his endorsment which I think he should do if its not a Clinton/Clinton campaign then it will be a Clinton/Edwards campaign. -
Answered No. This is typical politics,not plagiarism.
No not really, but at the end of the debate I wondered how many of those servicemen and women were in the hospital because no one bothered to read the NIE report and voted to let bush go to war in IRAQ. -
Answered Undecided
No. She's not the one that everyone is blindly voting for based on his ability to speak. Obama back pedaling on using his "friend's" line, without giving him credit....when you're TRYING to sound like every sound bite is your great idea...I think it should be. Obama doesn't NEED to borrow anyone's line IF he's the "Real Deal". But he isn't. SO, that being said. Hillary's not the one trying to create a false appearance of being something that she's not....He's not a leader of Change...He's not a leader of Unity. Just the
"appearance". -
Answered Undecided
Like her or don't like her, but I don't know how anyone can say Hillary Clinton lacks substance. That would be like saying Barack Obama lacks charisma. Let's get real. She said something really nice. Maybe it was to get votes, maybe it was sincere. Take your pick. She said it. -
Please read.
http://thecityedition.com/Pag... Republicans in love with Obama – a MUST read so you’ll understand what is going on in the primary election.
http://barackobamacandidate.org/ The candidate – an update -
Answered No. This is typical politics,not plagiarism.
Oh please... there's a big difference in a few similar words and entire inspirational speeches repeated verbatim!!! Her closing statement was a concept/sentiment that does echo one expressed by John Edwards but it was just that... similar concept.
Thinking about it honestly I hold the same sentiment (many of us do). Any hits I have taken in my life, from earthquakes to hurricanes, are nothing to the 'hits' that many Americans take every day. -
I honestly thought it was programmed and staged. That wasn't spontaneous and it was a sign of desperation on the part of the Clinton campaign. As for funny, I apparently don't have the same sense of humor as you.
You may have noticed that Obama did not make any nasty remarks to Hillary, and was a real gentleman during the entire debate. Hillary's Xerox comment was a personal failure. I once could have voted for her. Not any more. -
Answered Yes. Hillary lacks substance.
She is shameless. A vote for Hillary is a vote against integrity in our government, and I think we've had quite enough of that bs
edit:
CNN picks it up:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Answered Undecided
I honestly thought it was funny and smart when she said the "xerox" comment.. I don't care Hill is a tough lady and I hope more girls wan to be like her rather than the little twits like Paris Hilton or Britney Spears..