Apr 03, 2008 01:49AM GMTApril 03, 2008 01:49:53
Question Lifestyle - Health

Question Stats

21 answers
42 comments
raves +4  
Share This Question

Pot As Painkiller Creates Controversy Medical Marijuana OK In Some States, Despite Feds?

ST. PAUL -- Lynn Nicholson has spent a great deal of her life in more pain than most people could imagine.

When she was 10 years old, she and a friend were playing in the attic of her family’s house in Minneapolis when the floor gave way. The two girls fell 8 feet and crashed onto the floor below.






Lynn landed on the hard floor. She stumbled up to get help, but her back was so hurt she wasn’t able to balance herself and tumbled down a flight of stairs.

The falls compressed seven of her vertebrae and put her in the hospital. When she was brought home she couldn't even get out of bed.

"My mother said, 'Look, either you're going to get up and walk to the bathroom or you're going to pee on yourself, and you're going to get awful hungry if you don't get up and walk down to the dinner table,'" Nicholson recalled.

Although the pain never fully went away, Nicholson said she just learned to grin and bear it. She became a downhill skier and took survival trips to northern Minnesota, sometimes slinging a canoe on her back while portaging between rivers.

In 1975, she moved to Israel by herself when she was 16 and lived there for six years, becoming a dual citizen and serving several years in the Israeli military. She eventually moved back to Minneapolis, got married and had two children, who are now 18 and 20.

One day in the mid-1990s, she woke up after remodeling her kitchen and found that her back had given out. Her life has never been the same since that day.

She’s had 10 back surgeries and spent three years in a body cast. She’s been on a long list of painkillers and had to check herself into a detox facility in an effort to get off them. She received steroid injections in her back, which she said her doctors told her caused steroid-induced diabetes. She was prescribed the painkiller Fentanyl, of which a possible side effect according to some studies is tooth decay, and had to have all of her teeth pulled.

She put on more than 200 pounds, has trouble getting around and sometimes has to use a wheelchair and stair lift.

In order to help with the pain, Nicholson smokes marijuana. She said she does it because it does not produce the negative side effects of her prescribed painkillers, like addiction and tooth decay.


Nicholson said some of her doctors have recommended to her that she smoke, and others have shrugged their shoulders when she told them. None, she said, ever told her to stop.

The problem is that Nicholson lives in Minnesota, where doctors are not allowed to prescribe marijuana, so what she is doing is illegal. It's something that the former Hebrew teacher is not proud of.

"I don't like doing things that are illegal," said Nicholson. "I'm a mother. I don't believe in teaching my children to do as I say not as I do."

Nicholson soon may not have to break state law anymore. The Minnesota Legislature is close to passing a bill that would allow smoked marijuana to be prescribed by physicians.

State Laws May Change

The bill was passed by the state Senate last year, and Republican representative and co-sponsor of the bill Chris DeLaForest said he believes the bill has enough support to pass the House. But Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty has said he will veto the bill because of opposition to it by law enforcement organizations.


"In my world, I don't think we're going to be able to tell the good guys from the bad guys," said Bob Bushman, president of the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association, when he testified before the Senate in 2007.

DeLaForest said he believes Pawlenty could still be swayed to sign the bill, which would make Minnesota the 13th state in the country to pass a medical marijuana bill that is in direct defiance of federal law.

Other states, such as New York, Illinois and Rhode Island, also have medical marijuana bills currently under consideration by their state legislatures.

The federal government has classified marijuana a Schedule 1 drug, defining it as having no accepted medical benefit, and the DEA has raided numerous medical marijuana dispensary operators.

It's an issue that has many times pitted the federal government vs. state governments, law enforcement organizations vs. health organizations and popular opinion vs. politicians.

"It's the states' decision whether or not to legalize medical marijuana, in my view. It's not the federal government's job," said DeLaForest. "And so I see this as an issue of the states in some way asserting their rightful authority under our constitution to regulate the health, welfare and safety of their people."

A 2005 Gallup poll found that 78 percent of Americans support the lawful use of medical marijuana.

Is Marijuana Medicine?

The American College of Physicians, the Institute of Medicine, the American Public Health Association and dozens of other health and medical associations support the use of medical marijuana.

On the other end, the Bush Administration, including the Drug Enforcement Agency and Food and Drug Administration, and dozens of major law enforcement organizations oppose its use. The DEA has called for further studies into the delivery of smoke-free THC, the major psychoactive component of marijuana.

A synthetic THC drug, Marinol, has been available with a subscription to patients since 1985, but advocates argue that smoked marijuana is the most effective means of delivery.

An article in the May 2003 issue of The Lancet Neurology, which was cited by Marijuana Policy Project executive director Rob Kampia in testimony before a congressional subcommittee in 2004, stated that oral delivery "is probably the least satisfactory route for cannabis" because it "makes dose titration more difficult and therefore increases the potential for psychoactive effects."

The DEA states on a page of its Web site titled "Exposing the Myth of Smoked Medical Marijuana" that marijuana use contributes to crime, claiming that nationwide, 40 percent of adult males arrested in the United States tested positive for marijuana at the time of their arrest, although it does not state what study those statistics are based on or over what time frame it refers to.

The Minnesota County Attorneys Association and the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association oppose the bill.

"Marijuana is not a medicine," said MCAA President James C. Backstrom in an e-mail. "Medicine in this country requires the approval of the FDA before it is used to ensure the safety of Americans. Numerous studies and medical organizations, as noted in the MCAA position paper, have concluded that marijuana has no proven medical value."

Among the organizations cited was the American Medical Association, which recommends that marijuana remain a Schedule 1 drug, but has called for further studies including the delivery of smoke-free TCH.

The DEA also says on its Web site that supporters could use medical marijuana to advocate broader legalization of drug use.

DeLaForest is one of 17 state representatives co-sponsoring the bill and only one of two Republicans. He said he finds the arguments of opponents of medical marijuana baseless.

"There's no evidence that medical marijuana has caused an uptick in drug use, or drug-related violence or the like. It just isn't there," said DeLaForest.

DeLaForest said he does not support decriminalization of marijuana, but doesn't buy into the argument that medical marijuana could lead to a broader legalization of drugs.

"(California) legalized medical marijuana over 10 years ago," said DeLaForest. "There is no movement in the California Assembly or the state government to decriminalize marijuana in California. It just hasn't happened."

The Marijuana Policy Project, which has been lobbying congressmen in Minnesota and across the nation to pass medical marijuana bills, is in favor of the decriminalization of marijuana.

"Marijuana is a safer substance on every level than alcohol or tobacco," said Neal Levine, director of state campaigns for the MPP. "Maybe taxing and regulating marijuana is probably a more mature way to deal with it and better for society. But as far as Minnesota goes, and the Minnesota legislation, if we are going to have a war on marijuana, the least we can do is pull the sick and the dying off the battlefield."

That's a proposition that would make Nicholson happy. Because she must get marijuana through the criminal market she doesn't always have access to it and must continue to rely on the painkillers.

"My life would change because access wouldn't be an issue anymore," said Nicholson about the potential of the bill passing. "And I wouldn't feel like a criminal, and quite honestly, I don't like being a criminal in my children's eyes."
Add Image Add Video
resize
Loading Loading...
Top Comment
raves +5   by nltsierra

Answered None of the above

Just legalize already =) lol
view thread
Sort By: Raves | Date 1 2 Next » Last » Comments
  • raves     [-] by OZ151

    Answered None of the above

  • raves +1   [-] by angeleyes

    Answered Yes It should be legal for medical

    I feel the same way and the drs did me that way with pain killers
  • raves +1   [-] by Michael

    Answered Yes It should be legal for medical

    History and studies have provided us with documents that the government has been hiding facts that say marijuana is not as harmful as they play it to be. Just like how the Churches have been using Bible stories, the American government has been using the herb to control us. They have turn families and friends against one another. They have lied about their own findings and continue to use it as a means to control people through fear.
  • raves +1   [-] by M&Ms

    Answered Yes It should be legal for medical

    I love the top comment. My idea is to phase out cigarettes (just because more people are quitting) and let the cigarette growers produce the finest marijuana possible. Forget the pharnaceutical companies--but remember, not everyone lives in an area where it's hot enough to grow your own or grow undetected. Believe it or not, where I live, people still get arrested for growing and owning small amounts and "paraphernalia". A member of my family has acute polyarthritis and is allowed enough percocet to prevent addiction. Unfortunately, the drug isn't enough to do much for the pain he's in 24/7. Marijuana does help him though, and in this state all marijauna is
    illegal. I know studies have shown medical marijuana helps patients with MS and has kept countless AIDS victims going by stimulating their appetite.Oh, just read the top comment again. And support NORML.
  • raves +2   [-] by Rog [Ninja]™

    Answered Yes It should be legal for medical

    Ever since Prohibition, lies formed by racism and greed have been accepted as the norm.
    Alcohol and Tobacco kill more people than guns.
    How many doctors would write a script for Alcohol or cigarettes? Yet, they are legal.
    Until we can unlearn the lie our government and thier lobbists have told us for so long, we may have a chance do REAL research and prove the benefits.
    For Centuries it has been a treatment for all types of medical issues.
    Lobbists for Medical M. don't have the monies to compete with Alcohol, Tobacco and Pharm. Companies.
    I've seen too many benifits for individuals, who really need it, to doubt it's effectivness.
    More people should be exposed to the FACTS, not just the stoner kid down the street!
    If I where perscribed MM over Oxyc., it's MM everytime!
    My liver is important to me!!!!
  • raves +2   [-] by brady444

    Answered Yes It should be legal for medical

    mary jane is great and safe...LEGALIZE IT
  • raves +3   [-] by Mtnman

    Answered None of the above

    Should be legal altogether, especially for medical use. I am sick to death of the 1936 "Reefer Madness" bullshit propaganda the government uses to keep it illegal. Anyone who thinks it is better for a cancer or aids patient to puke all day after chemo treatments should get a chance to try a little chemo themselves. Bet they would change their minds real quick.
  • raves +3   [-] by Donnie

    Answered Yes It should be legal for medical

    Anyone using it for medical reasons you would be better off eating it that way you have no damage to your lungs I`v had a doctor tell me if it was legal he would prescribe it over other pain pills. Long use of pain killers gives you a 25% chance of developing stomach cancer
  • raves +2   [-] Mtnman replied to Donnie
    Donnie, I personally prefer smoking it. It is expensive and takes a lot more when you eat it. A good quality joint will usually work with 3 to 5 tokes, and 1 batch of brownies takes an oz or more.
    Most pain meds are also very hard on the liver. I believe most doctors would rather prescribe pot but due to the federal bs some are afraid to say so. Who wants to be on the DEA shit list?
  • raves +1   [-] Florida Keys replied to Mtnman
    I agree...I am taking pills now that I am having side effects. My last blood test starting showing the beginning of kidney failure and liver... The doctor tells me taking the medication out weighs the disease..
  • raves +2   [-] Mtnman replied to Florida Keys
    Florida Keys, I'm sorry to hear that. I don't know if pot would replace the pills for your particular problem, but if it would it definately does not have the potentially deadly side effects in liver and kidneys. I hope things get better for you.
  • raves +1   [-] Florida Keys replied to Mtnman
    Thanks
  • raves +2   [-] by Carol

    Answered Yes It should be legal for medical

    It should be sold just like alcohol.
  • raves +4   [-] by Boats

    Answered Yes It should be legal for medical

    Pot is good for pain.I for one can vouch for that.I have essential hypertension and have been taking various blood pressure medicines that have'nt had much effect.My cousin suggested I try pot.I did and my blood pressure went down to 172/65.I,m not suggesting it works for everyone,I believe a persons genetic makeup has a lot to do with what goes on in a persons body,but it worked for me.Yes,it should be legalized.
  • raves +2   [-] by lou lou

    Answered Yes It should be legal for medical

    I had a friend who had AIDS and the medicine he was taking made him have no appitite and left him with no energy. He wanted to feel good for the last days of his life so started to smoke a little. He was able to spend more quality time with his family before he passed away.
    My grandma even said she would take it for her pain if it were illegal. She has severe scoliosis and her hip and neck are totally deteriorationg from it. She wakes up with pain everyday. She does everything natural and the only pharmaceudical she takes is for her heart pressure.
  • raves +4   [-] by Magzilla

    Answered Yes It should be legal for medical

    It should be legal for other reasons too.
  • raves +5   [-] by nltsierra

    Answered None of the above

    Just legalize already =) lol
  • raves +5   [-] by Alexis

    Answered Undecided

    It should be legalized, period. And I don't smoke anything either because I have asthma. But I think they should have it in pill form for medicinal purposes available everywhere without perscription.
  • raves +2   [-] Mtnman replied to Alexis
    Alexis, they do have it in pill form called Marinol. You do need a prescription tho. It is a thc pill. Not as effective as smoking because it is the combo of thc and the other cannabinoids you get when smoking or eating the actual plant that do the most good.
  • raves +2   [-] Alexis replied to Mtnman
    Thanks for the info!
  • raves +1   [-] Rog [Ninja]™ replied to Alexis
    There are many ways to use MM.
    all are effective.
    Some take longer to work, but may last longer as well.
    If you are really interested in trying it, see your doctor first and be very candid and tell him you would like to check ALL options!
    check these out.
    ccrmg.org
    safeaccessnow.org
    americanmarijuana.org
  • raves +3   [-] by Angel

    Answered Yes It should be legal for medical

    yes legalize marijuana
  • raves +7   [-] Florida Keys replied to Angel
    Well one thing for sure...If they legalize it, we will have a lot of Soda Heads who aren't in pain...LOL
  • raves +2   [-] Angel replied to Florida Keys
    lol yes and laid back.....nomore bickering....lol
  • raves +1   [-] Mtnman replied to Florida Keys
    Florida Keys, I think we already do. People who want to smoke it for pain or otherwise will, legal or illegal. Personal freedom is a very good thing, too bad the government doesn't want us to have any.
  • raves +5   [-] by eyebrowz

    Answered Yes It should be legal for medical

    and there are more medical implications that can be helped through the use of marijuana. It slows down the growth of cancerous cells, helps with ptsd, depression, anxiety, anorexia, and many more. What I find particularly funny, is how the government has no problems legalizing medical cocaine, morphine, oxycontin, methadone, ect... which are a million times more addicting, and harmful than marijuana would ever be.
  • raves +3   [-] Mtnman replied to eyebrowz
    eyebrowz, If by funny you mean odd, it's because that's where the money is. You can grow your own pot and that scares the hell out of them. Someone might have something that they don't get the money from. Check out the White House Drug Policy on Marijuana if you really want to see something funny. It's ridiculous. The FDA calls all the deadly meds you mentioned "more safe and effective medicines". What a hoot.
  • raves +4   [-] by Nate Hussein SD

    Answered None of the above

    It should be legal, period.
  • raves +3   [-] by Eddie