-
raves -1 posted May 01, 2008 08:14PM GMT
Answered Undecided
Obama is a much better speaker on the issues. He's more articulate, and he sticks to the issues that are affecting people (war, economy, our rights). Hillary, unfortunately, has been on a negative streak ever since she fired her campaign managers a few months ago. My perspective is that this strategy will only hurt the Democrat's candidate in the fall. -
raves -1 posted May 01, 2008 03:33AM GMT
Answered That was an Obama bashing night.
i just wish we could keep our focus on the issues. Hillary, will do, say, drink, and smile in all our face at the same time she's telling one lie after another. she only got high number in PA., state, because most of them our in the same mind set as rev. Wright. someone once said, some of these people have cast there vote way back in the 40-50-60-70's. Change is only possible in the generation after that. You can't teach a old dog new tricks. -
raves +3 -1 posted Apr 27, 2008 04:45PM GMT
Answered Obama answered the "gaffe" question poorly; Hillary clearly won and is a far better debator.
Hillary is a far better debator...why else do you think Mr Obama doesn't want to have any more debates with her. All he can do is make pretty speeches. He can't even answer the hard questions and his issues are weak. It seems every day talking is out of his relm. Some President he will make! -
raves +1 -2 posted Apr 25, 2008 11:30PM GMT
Answered That was an Obama bashing night.
All hillary ever does is lie and point fingers at obama, simply b/c he is her opponent. I feel that if anyone else was her opponent, just as much dirt would have come up on them as that on Obama in these primaries. I dont believe a person like her could or should be trusted. -
raves +1 -1 posted Apr 24, 2008 11:24PM GMT
Answered That was an Obama bashing night.
How is it okay for a former member or Bill Clinton's staff to have been a moderator for that debate? I think it was extremely unfair and illegal for him to be a moderator. No wonder it made Obama seem secondary. It was slanted to make him look bad. -
raves +4 -1 posted Apr 23, 2008 11:02PM GMT
Answered Hillary was a little sharper at the end, but no one was a star last night.
Hillary knowsthe problems, Obama has to ask his advisers, she has experience, Obama is learning, Hillary jumps in call for both sides of the story to solve the problem,,
Obama is looking for an answer. -
raves +1 -2 Apr 22, 2008 10:50PM GMTCindy shut-up. You have no room to talk I don't see you running for president. We all know he going to answer to tough question in Nov. we are not dumb. You will are just lucky that's not you. You'll probly have a meltdown if the poperocy [know I SPELLED THAT WRONG] were asking you tough qustion and one you don't really understand allmost for 2 years.if you have anything to say to me e-mail me at ashleighbass2comcast.net.Obama Supporter
-
raves -3 posted Apr 22, 2008 06:06PM GMT
Answered That was an Obama bashing night.
I think that Obama did a good job of answering the questions that he has to answer over and over again and I think that they should hound hillary about Bosnia and the other lies that she tells. But the media really stick it to Obama unfairly. -
raves +2 -1 Apr 22, 2008 03:23PM GMTSome people tend to dismiss what they see for personal bias. They wanted Obama to do well. Therefore it was not the fact that Obama answered the questions poorly, but more that the media bashed him. Its funny how peope can lay blame.
Fact, if Obama won the presidency, who would you blame then? Him? Or the other people who railroaded him?
At least with Hillary, she can own up to her own poor mispeakings. She does not bury them like other people running for presidency. -
raves +4
Answered Undecided
LATEST NEWSWEEK POLL 04-18 OBAMA 54 HILLARY 35!