May 04, 2008 07:09PM GMT

Question • Politics - Other

Posted by Marshal

Question Stats

3,012 answers

3,664 comments

raves +124 -130

Share This Question

Are you excited about having Michelle Obama as First Lady?

Are you excited about having Michelle Obama as First Lady?

It looks like we are going to have a First Lady we can be proud of for a change. A strong woman to compliment a strong man.

Answers
Results
Who Answered?

Yes. She has the grace, class and intellegence we have been lacking for too long.
No. She is too opinionated. Strong women don't belong in the White House.
Undecided (Please leave a comment)

Comment

Add Image Add Video

resize

Loading...

Top Comment

raves +196 -97 by greenwoodtree posted May 04, 2008 07:35PM GMT

greenwoodtree

reply

Answered Undecided

Grace and class? Had your glasses changed lately? That's the frumpiest first lady I've ever seen. I saw her on some video yesterday and she looked like she climbed out of a rag bag. She makes Hillary look like she came straight from Paris. Proud of a woman who has never been proud of America until her husband is a presidential candidate and who thinks this a "mean" country? I don't think so.

Sort By: Raves | Date «« First « Prev 1 2 3 4 ... Next » Last » Comments

raves [-] Not Einstein replied to gby666 Aug 04, 2008 10:00PM GMTAugust 04, 2008 22:00:54

reply
And gby666, your rant has to do with Michelle Obama in what way?
raves +1 [-] poetsilver replied to nancy Aug 28, 2008 12:13AM GMTAugust 28, 2008 00:13:50

reply
Don't forget we will need a strong women that opinionated in the White house, that how things get done.
raves +3 [-] by palie posted Jun 01, 2008 02:12AM GMTJune 01, 2008 02:12:46

reply

Answered No. She is too opinionated. Strong women don't belong in the White House.
DONT MAKE ME THROW UP!!!!!
raves +5 -1 [-] by ypdd91 posted May 29, 2008 06:29PM GMTMay 29, 2008 18:29:03

reply

Answered Yes. She has the grace, class and intellegence we have been lacking for too long.
hell yeah
raves +1 [-] by MrMike posted May 27, 2008 03:21PM GMTMay 27, 2008 15:21:46

reply

Answered Undecided
I really want to say no, but the choice of answer does not fit. Strong women do belong in the White House, (that is why Hillary should win), but Michelle's opinionatedness is a deterrent to Barack winning, (she turns too many people off).
raves +2 [-] by jm posted May 27, 2008 02:44AM GMTMay 27, 2008 02:44:38

reply

Answered Undecided
Actually my answer is emphatically "NO"!
NObama at ALL in the white house. We do not need the racist Barry or his nasty, mean and hateful racist wife Michelle in the White House.
They will lose to John McCain anyway.
The only woman that should be in the White House is Hillary Clinton as the 44th President of the United States!
Boooooooo to the Obamas and their ObamaBOTS!!
raves +3 [-] svetrock replied to jm Jul 09, 2008 10:07PM GMTJuly 09, 2008 22:07:24

reply
You are not very sensitive my friend. Before you make such judgments you ought to have a better education. After that your choice might mean something. At his point your hatred attitude will lead nowhere. I feel sorry for you. Mrs. R.
raves +2 -1 [-] by Amanda posted May 26, 2008 07:19PM GMTMay 26, 2008 19:19:20

reply

Answered No. She is too opinionated. Strong women don't belong in the White House.
I must amend the comment option... Strong women do have a place in the White House but not anti-Americans!
raves +4 [-] svetrock replied to Amanda Jul 09, 2008 10:13PM GMTJuly 09, 2008 22:13:54

reply
Do you REALLY think that Michelle is anti American?
Think twice. You are SO WRONG my friend. I hope that you will see otherwise in November and the years to follow if Barrack is elected.
The woman came from a poor background and was able to struggle to get a good education. If all Americans had this energy and education we would not be in the mess we are in right now. The Obama team understands this better than most and will help everyone to get ahead as much as they can. Michelle is the strongest potential lady we have, give her a chance my friend.
raves +1 [-] Terry replied to svetrock Nov 06, 2008 02:18AM GMTNovember 06, 2008 02:18:58

reply
yeah she was poor and educated off the taxpayers but she is just now proud to be an American--give me a break
raves [-] nana55 replied to svetrock Nov 08, 2008 02:51PM GMTNovember 08, 2008 14:51:08

reply
did not mean to rave you please forgive and do not misunderstand I do not agree with you.
raves +2 -1 [-] by knothead posted May 26, 2008 02:49PM GMTMay 26, 2008 14:49:19

reply

Answered Undecided
She is more racisct and bigotted than anyone else. They dont belong in the White House or in any political position.
raves +3 [-] svetrock replied to knothead Jul 09, 2008 10:14PM GMTJuly 09, 2008 22:14:40

reply
I do not know where you get this idea! It seems to me your hatred ought to be dealt with.
raves +1 [-] by 4X4 posted May 25, 2008 10:20PM GMTMay 25, 2008 22:20:38

reply

Answered Undecided
Don't know much about her looks. But it appears that her attitude sucks.
raves +3 [-] svetrock replied to 4X4 Jul 09, 2008 10:15PM GMTJuly 09, 2008 22:15:50

reply
Your use of fowl language will certainly not help the situation. A little more grace might help my friend. Compassion is the only way to get ahead.
raves -2 [-] by Rayburn from Texas posted May 25, 2008 04:10AM GMTMay 25, 2008 04:10:20

reply

Answered No. She is too opinionated. Strong women don't belong in the White House.
Just plain No. It's not that she's opinionated, it's that she seems to have a chip on her shoulder.
raves +4 [-] svetrock replied to Rayburn from Texas Jul 09, 2008 10:17PM GMTJuly 09, 2008 22:17:08

reply
It seems to me the writer has a chip on His or Her shoulder, certainly NOT Michelle who is the brightest woman on the horizon.
raves +5 [-] by Tamm posted May 24, 2008 10:50PM GMTMay 24, 2008 22:50:06

reply

Answered Yes. She has the grace, class and intellegence we have been lacking for too long.
I think she would be a welcome change.
raves -1 [-] by Sheena~McCain/Palin posted May 24, 2008 07:03PM GMTMay 24, 2008 19:03:05

reply

Answered No. She is too opinionated. Strong women don't belong in the White House.
Way too hormonal !!
raves [-] flowertree replied to Sheena~McCain/Palin Sep 05, 2008 03:41AM GMTSeptember 05, 2008 03:41:43

reply
THAT IS ABOUT AS 18 TH CENTURY AS YOU CAN GET!!! WHAT ROCK HAVE YOU BEEN LIVING UNDER?
raves [-] Sheena~McCain/Palin replied to flowertree Sep 06, 2008 07:11PM GMTSeptember 06, 2008 19:11:14

reply
This was in response to BHO staff making menopausal remarks about Clinton.
raves -3 [-] by Cheryl posted May 24, 2008 06:11PM GMTMay 24, 2008 18:11:43

reply

Answered No. She is too opinionated. Strong women don't belong in the White House.
Michelle Obama is absolutely despicable! She made racist remarks in her "black man" speech, was appalling in her UNpatriotic remark about not being proud to be an American and now the GOP is said to have footage of her railing against "whitey" in the Trinity church pulpit. Michelle Obama is a disgrace!
raves +1 -2 [-] by bencali posted May 24, 2008 04:33PM GMTMay 24, 2008 16:33:50

reply

Answered No. She is too opinionated. Strong women don't belong in the White House.
No, she could not become a First Lady. She is so racist. Why does she love America now? What was happen in the past? Racist! Racist!
raves +1 -1 [-] by Fast Eddie posted May 24, 2008 03:35PM GMTMay 24, 2008 15:35:37

reply

Answered No. She is too opinionated. Strong women don't belong in the White House.
No, she is a racist.
raves [-] Sheena~McCain/Palin replied to Fast Eddie May 24, 2008 06:11PM GMTMay 24, 2008 18:11:55

reply

Millions of people in Florida and Michigan went to the polls to make their voices heard in the Democratic Presidential primary. They deserve to have their votes count.

The DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee is meeting on May 31 to make a decision about Florida and Michigan. Send a message to the DNC telling them to count the votes and seat Florida and Michigan's delegates.

CAST YOUR VOTE

http://www.hillaryclinton.com...
raves -1 [-] by rcarr posted May 23, 2008 11:39PM GMTMay 23, 2008 23:39:00

reply

Answered No. She is too opinionated. Strong women don't belong in the White House.
http://www.geneclark.net/Bara...
raves +5 [-] by Maggie posted May 23, 2008 03:28AM GMTMay 23, 2008 03:28:10

reply

Answered Yes. She has the grace, class and intellegence we have been lacking for too long.
The answer is already given. Grace, class.....
raves +1 -1 [-] GLO replied to Maggie May 23, 2008 09:13PM GMTMay 23, 2008 21:13:33

reply
hahaha
raves [-] rcarr replied to Maggie May 23, 2008 11:39PM GMTMay 23, 2008 23:39:24

reply
http://www.geneclark.net/Bara...
raves +3 [-] Cheryl replied to Maggie May 24, 2008 06:16PM GMTMay 24, 2008 18:16:30

reply
The woman wouldn't know what grace and class was if it fell on her.
raves [-] hippy49 replied to Cheryl May 27, 2008 07:39AM GMTMay 27, 2008 07:39:58

reply
Bill might make a much better first lady, after all he spends most of his time trying to get in womens panties ( except Hillary's)
raves +6 [-] by Angel41 posted May 23, 2008 02:46AM GMTMay 23, 2008 02:46:04

reply

Answered Yes. She has the grace, class and intellegence we have been lacking for too long.
Bring it on Michelle!!!
raves [-] rcarr replied to Angel41 May 23, 2008 11:39PM GMTMay 23, 2008 23:39:32

reply
http://www.geneclark.net/Bara...
raves +3 [-] svetrock replied to Angel41 Jul 09, 2008 10:19PM GMTJuly 09, 2008 22:19:56

reply
Finally an intelligent reply! I am horrified to see the rest of the people who send messages. They ought to go back to school or go to church more often or go to the shrink to get some help! I feel for them. You make sense, what a relief! Mrs. R.
raves +2 [-]