May 06, 2008 02:29AM GMTMay 06, 2008 02:29:53
Posted by Jerry

Question Stats

2,045 answers
2,468 comments
raves +141 -16
Share This Question

Should there be a law against pregnant women smoking?

Isn't that child abuse?
Add Image Add Video
resize

* these fields are required to answer

I agree to the SodaHead TOS and Privacy

Loading Loading...
Top Comment
raves +73 -31 by mrorganic77

Answered No

Absolutely not, no one or government has the right to legislate morals. It is all about education and morals, not making more laws.
view thread
Sort By: Raves | Date 1 2 3 4 ... Next » Last » Comments
  • raves +2   [-] by Candy-McCain/Palin

    Answered Yes

    If a women does not have common sense enough to stop...then yes the unborn needs protection. I believe women who have babies delivered with drug addictions should be sterilized to prevent high number of dependent babies. babies delivered drug addictions sterilized prevent high number dependent babies
  • raves +1   [-] by Tiffany

    Answered Yes

    omg their babies can have serous problems when it is born... and we dont want any trailer trash hookers have down syndrome kids, because we all know that they wouldnt take care of them because they are to busy smoking and having s*x. by the way, who would want to marry & have kids with people like that?
  • raves +2   [-] by hoppy

    Answered Yes

    I agree it is a smoker's right to smoke but it is the right of others to not smoke including babies who do not yet have a voice to choose one way or the other. let them live without it and wait until they are 18 to decide.
  • raves +1   [-] by Maddy

    Answered No

    Do I think it's right? Absolutely not. It's horrible. But we can't just put a law out there that says "Nope. Can't do that anymore. We don't like it," without having other laws and issues follow. I think that this is too interlinked with constitutional rights to create a law for; however I believe that other things could be done to help prevent it.
    Also, on a slightly different note, some female smokers might get accidentally pregnant. Some of them can't just quit cold turkey when they find out that they're pregnant, but they do eventually stop smoking- it just takes time. It's not good, but they can't help it and need time. They care about the child so they quit, so I thought that that might be worth mentioning instead of just putting all smokers ("I don't care if I'm pregnant I'll smoke if I want to" VS. Those who quit but just need time) together.
  • raves     [-] by spoiled brat

    Answered Undecided

    idk
  • raves +1   [-] by Sweetness

    Answered Yes

    but i don't see it for the child abuse thing
    althogh it is a good point
    but more cause its just really really idiotic if a pregnant women smokes
    i mean
    do you want a brain damaged child?
    its just wrong
  • raves +1   [-] by babydoll06

    Answered Yes

    Some people just don't have any sense.
  • raves +1   [-] by Emily<3Zero

    Answered Yes

    It's just selfish....
  • raves +1   [-] by Amber

    Answered Yes

    yes
  • raves     [-] by chevyprincess

    Answered No

    unfortunly we can't tell someone what they can or can't do with their bodys all we can do is inform then on the risks...me when i was prago i quit smoking and drinking caffine but that was my choice and onbody elses
  • raves     [-] by SilentK_MCR

    Answered No

    I understand that it is HORRIBLE for the baby! But it's the mother's choice what she does.
    I don't think people should be arrested for poor morals.
  • raves     [-] by Stix

    Answered No

    We are not communist though with the amount of laws passing I am begining to wonder. What would follow this law? Being told what to eat and drink, how much sleep we must get a night.

    All you can do is teach about the harm of smoking, over eating, etc. and leave it to the individual.
  • raves +2   [-] by Eager Beaver(the one and only)

    Answered No

    but we should be aloud to slap them when we see it
  • raves +1   [-] by Jerry
    I'll go along with that.
  • raves     [-] by Dr. Hotensecksy

    Answered Undecided

    I don't know about a law, though I would like to say yes but I think it would maybe cause more trouble than anything but I want to smack the woman every time I see them smoking
  • raves +1   [-] by Mollydolly

    Answered Undecided

    although I do not approve of anyone smoking and feel that it should be banned across the board, I do not feel that we can single out certain people for whatever reason. just seems wrong
  • raves     [-] by Jerry
    We have to single people out. If I say punish the child molesters will you still say that we shouldn't single people out? They are poisoning their unborn children. It amazes me how little so many people care about babies and unborn babies.
  • raves     [-] by Stix
    You are poisoning yourself when you eat junk, when you drink alcohol. When you drive over the speed limit you are playing a game that may cost you or someone else their life.

    You are being silly when you compare a child molester, murderer, rapist, robber to a woman smoking.

    Some doctors ask women to cut back but not quit smoking if they are heavy smokers as the withdrawl symptoms can be harder on the baby than cutting way back. Of course it's not good for the baby, but neither is shoving all that take out into their mouths, or gaining 70 pounds.

    Do you want to be the monitor of who is allowed to do what here in the United States? Bet if we spent a week with you we could come up with many bad habits from you that we don't like.
  • raves +1   [-] by Meryl

    Answered No

    Please not another law restricting our freedom. The government has enough to do, and policing this and similar laws do not make sense. I have two wonderful children and smoked while pregnant.
  • raves +1   [-] by Decius

    Answered No

    What r u going to do? Put them in prison? Or just fine them and give more money to the politicians. However I believe they should not smoke while pregnant.
  • raves +2   [-] by *((Pinky Roo))* ((*GuNNS*))

    Answered Yes

    my opinion would be yes........
  • raves +1   [-] by Tweetz

    Answered Yes

    Yes and yes.
  • raves +1 -1 [-] by [[DESTINY]][[MARIEE]] :]

    Answered No

    My mom is having a baby and she smoked during her pregnancy with me and my brother.
  • raves     [-] by mike

    Answered Undecided

    The child should be more important than a cigerette...I'm always weary of more laws....when you open the door to a new law....it opens more down the road.
  • raves +2   [-] by GypsyRose

    Answered No

    While I agree that pregnant women should not smoke and am fully against abortion (my views there run extremely right wing), I am not in favor of any government mandates on who can smoke and who can't. Why? I agree with the view that people should make their own moral personal decisions for not only themselves, but their children. But this is an extremely tricky subject with no really clear answer.
    If a pregnant woman continues to smoke, it is possible that some harm could come to the unborn baby. But by making a law on this very personal decision, well- what law would come next? See, this sort of thing opens a doorway to who knows what? And we have too much government influence on our lives as it is.
    I think that the best answer here would be to really encourage pregnant smokers to stop. If they need help doing this cause they can't seem to kick it on their own, maybe some programs could be implemented to help them. After all, smoking is highly addictive and not the easiest habit in the world to kick. Maybe like a short-term place (sort of like a rehab) that will get people on the right path to stopping? Sounds extreme but for some people, this is the sort of thing it takes. Depends on how serious society is about trying to help people stop.
  • raves +1   [-] by triteliberty

    Answered No

    How will you fund enforcement of a law like that?
  • raves     [-] by Stix
    Most states have programs at local hospitals where they give the nicotine patch and classes free. The states won money from the tobacco companies, which they don't advertise to much, but the money was put away and earmarked for smoking sessation classes. So there already are programs in place paid for by the cigarette companies.
  • raves +3   [-] by doctork

    Answered Yes

    Also blocking adults from smoking when children are in a car: Second hand smoke is deadly too. But, how can this be enforced?
  • raves +3   [-] by triteliberty
    "... But, how can this be enforced?" - doctork

    This is why you should have answered no. What good is a law you can not enforce.

    Would you support a similar law for trans fat?
    How is one health concern more legal than the next?
    What about riding motorcylces when your pregnant? ..or a car for that matter...
  • raves +1   [-] by looloo

    Answered No

    no! women's choice women's right as much as i agree with the whole breathing for two thing it's the women's choice same with abortion
  • raves +1   [-] by Alo2007

    Answered Yes

    YES!!! how do you think the baby is going to be born??....its not going to be a helthy baby..its going to have some problems...for what the dumb, selfish mother did..so my awenser is a YES!!
  • raves +3   [-] by Robin

    Answered No

    If government is given the power to control THAT kind of human behavior, it can control anything. That's called totalitarianism.
  • raves +1   [-] by