May 13, 2008 06:44PM GMTMay 13, 2008 18:44:16

Question Stats

3,246 answers
3,392 comments
raves +57 -6
Share This Question

Does a West Virginia win mean Hillary Clinton still has a chance as Democratic nominee?

West Virginia is said to be held by Hillary Clinton supporters. If this is the case, does Hillary still have a chance to stay in the race. Or should she give up and give Barack Obama more time to campaign against John McCain? Check out these questions: Should "In God We Trust" be taken off of US money?
When Barack Wins The Nomination Will You Vote For McCain In The General Election?
Add Image Add Video
resize

* these fields are required to answer

I agree to the SodaHead TOS and Privacy

Loading Loading...
Top Comment
raves +95 -55 by Arkansaslady

Answered Yes; It proves that Hillary Clinton has the working-class vote leading to higher "electability."

I am for Hillary,I dont understand this delegate stuff.I think the whole ought to be heard not just a few from different states.You go by what the people want ,its Hillary.I think she would be best for the job.I think 3/4 of the people thinks so.Black & White, Spanish.My opinion Obama has no experience ,think our country will go further under.People better think.
view thread
Sort By: Raves | Date «« First « Prev ... 9 10 11 12 ... Next » Last » Comments
  • raves +2 -3 [-] by toni
    Those "sniper attacks" were so convincing. Wanna buy some swampland?
  • raves   -4 [-] by ~daffodilmommyof3~McCain/Palin
    who cares about the sniper attack story already! All politicians lie its the size and importance of the lies that we need to look at. Obama himself said he wasnt going to run for president this year back in 2004 because of lack of experience and that he needed to learn more before doing that but look where we are now?
  • raves +7 -3 [-] by Duck
    Heck, Mickey Mouse is more real than Obama....
  • raves +1   [-] by Peter Griffin
    LOL
  • raves +4 -4 [-] by cherrypiea

    Answered Yes; It proves that Hillary Clinton has the working-class vote leading to higher "electability."

    she's the best choice of the three, obama is full of it, he is using hitler's tactics that were used when the germans were desparate for a leader back when they were in a deep recession and he was making wonderful promisies if you have ever read any of hitlers speeches you can see the same likeness in obama and hitler. and no i'm not a white supremest only a concerned citizen.
  • raves +2 -6 [-] by hunter 44

    Answered No; Barack Obama still has a better chance of winning in November.

    Clintons done. Obamas ignoring her and looking to Nov. as he should be.
  • raves +7 -3 [-] by realestatesuzzi

    Answered Yes; It proves that Hillary Clinton has the working-class vote leading to higher "electability."

    If Obama gets the nomination, I'm crossing over for the first time in my 45 years. Mc Cain will be a far better choice, he is a most liberal Republican and I think he is having such a strong stance on the war to hang on to all of the conservatives he can. I think there will be different actions in office, He and Hillary are close and I think she can keep him on focus and abreast of what is most important. I will never vote for Obama. He is not ready for office, he has been groomed by Illinois gangsters, he affiliates with anti-american criminal figures, these people are violent and angry and have been in his life for over 20 years, his monkey faced wife was the one responsible for bringing them together and I can go on and on. Obama is the stupidest thing I have seen the democrats do to date. I am sick...... I may vote for him if Hill or Edwards is on the ticket for V.P. because we know what is going to happen to Obama.......
  • raves +2   [-] by Artistry
    ...What a deplorable thing to say . in fact two things, are you beautiful or are you only you know what/ Obama is stupid, what is you i.q. , do you really think they would have made him Harvard Law Review President if he was stupid, do you read, have you read any of his position papers?
    This man may be smarter than Bill CVlinto , who,is Rhodes Scholar,
    You are quite welcome to your opinions, but get your facts straight, please. I am sure you have been happy with the state of the country lately, because, a person who you probably think does not have a monkey face is in the White House :o). Be happy in your sad world, presious, you have a lot of learning to d if you can. Oh by the GWB who was not a part of the ganster world as you talk about sent 4,00 people to their death in Iraq, you approve I'm sure, the VP said it was a volunteer army so it was fine what has happened. Youmlike that , yes. My, My, My, what mindsets we have, Alice.
  • raves +5 -2 [-] by Richard

    Answered Yes; It proves that Hillary Clinton has the working-class vote leading to higher "electability."

    We need a leader that will make things happen Hillary is that person.
    Obama will only win if he doe's it will be because of his RACE!!!!!!
  • raves +1 -1 [-] by Kat
    sad statement there richard. Why do Hillary supporters need to stoop to race? Which race are you referring to... because millions of people from all races are voting for Obama.
  • raves +2 -1 [-] by Guppy,the bagged pudding ghost

    Answered I'm unsure because . . .

    a few states still have primaries so it can go either way, but obama is PROBABLY going to get the nomination
  • raves +2   [-] by The Libertarian

    Answered Yes; It proves that Hillary Clinton has the working-class vote leading to higher "electability."

    However, she loses because she can't gain enough independents and she galvanizes the right.
  • raves +5 -2 [-] by renee77

    Answered Yes; It proves that Hillary Clinton has the working-class vote leading to higher "electability."

    it sickens me to even think of Michelle being first lady.. shed need a bag over her head and him too
  • raves +1 -3 [-] by Guppy,the bagged pudding ghost
    so you choose due to looks, what a loser
  • raves +2 -2 [-] by Arel

    Answered Yes; It proves that Hillary Clinton has the working-class vote leading to higher "electability."

    but she will not get the democratic nomination they have already decided no matter what happens that it is Obama. She could kick his butt in the rest of the states and keep him from getting that magic delegate number but he is still the golden boy. I don't think he will beat McCain she has a much better chance of that..............
  • raves +2 -5 [-] by Smokey

    Answered No; Barack Obama still has a better chance of winning in November.

    West Virginians can't spell their own names. :)
  • raves +1   [-] by standstill
    That is not nice thing to say. Everybody, even smart ones misspelled sometimes. And what's this spelling thing got to do with this. West Virginians should reprimand you for this comment. If you see one thumbs down, that's me
  • raves +1   [-] by Smokey
    Hey, I was only joking. By the way, I live in Virginia, and we're not too much better. :) LOL
  • raves +6 -2 [-] by annie

    Answered Yes; It proves that Hillary Clinton has the working-class vote leading to higher "electability."

    This race on the Democratic side has me concerned. You have people coming to Obama's side but my question in my mind is what has he promised them, there is a cost to most indorsements. I have learned in my years of working, that men will support men not women and women will not support other women with the same strength as men support each other, not sure why. I do not think that superdeligates should state who they are for Mr. Howard Dean. I think the contest between the two is healthy and should be left alone. Whether one likes my comment or not but some voting is based only on race not on experience and qualifications. News media has not been as considerate with Hillary as they have been with Obama. Obama has been given more time on the news, more interviews, and many of the news casters (they have given him so much free air time), are bias and are extremely against Hillary and do not give her the same consideration, it has been that way since last fall. They let Michelle get by on her comments but Bill gets beaten up. Hillary is an independent women and should be considered on her merit alone, not her spouse. I give her respect for not crying foul play. Florida and Michigan should be seated just as how the votes came in. Obama crying that he did not campaign and took his name off the ballot was a stupid mistake and error in judgement and when I have done stupid mistakes I have been told get over it and except it and move on. What a blessing those two states had with no...
    This race on the Democratic side has me concerned. You have people coming to Obama's side but my question in my mind is what has he promised them, there is a cost to most indorsements. I have learned in my years of working, that men will support men not women and women will not support other women with the same strength as men support each other, not sure why. I do not think that superdeligates should state who they are for Mr. Howard Dean. I think the contest between the two is healthy and should be left alone. Whether one likes my comment or not but some voting is based only on race not on experience and qualifications. News media has not been as considerate with Hillary as they have been with Obama. Obama has been given more time on the news, more interviews, and many of the news casters (they have given him so much free air time), are bias and are extremely against Hillary and do not give her the same consideration, it has been that way since last fall. They let Michelle get by on her comments but Bill gets beaten up. Hillary is an independent women and should be considered on her merit alone, not her spouse. I give her respect for not crying foul play. Florida and Michigan should be seated just as how the votes came in. Obama crying that he did not campaign and took his name off the ballot was a stupid mistake and error in judgement and when I have done stupid mistakes I have been told get over it and except it and move on. What a blessing those two states had with no campaigning from the candidates. When I think of campaigning on the word change and courting the young people I think about Jessie Ventura, the only thing that I can say about that is that everyone knew who the governor was Minnesota and the people were truly disappointed. Change is just a word and we make changes in our life every day. Yes I think that Hillary has more electability. Obama is like a new toy that may be defective and will have to be recalled. His foundation for our country, not sure.
  • raves +1 -2 [-] by Hillsgirl
    You said it all!
    If the superdelegates had not been allowed to influence voters with bought and paid for endorements it would be a different election now!
  • raves +1 -1 [-] by Kat
    Funny how you never complained about super delegates being "bought and paid for" when they were supporting Hillary. Seems to be a double standard here....or sour grapes.
  • raves +3 -2 [-] by Rick

    Answered No; Barack Obama still has a better chance of winning in November.

    Hillary is toast!
  • raves +2 -3 [-] by JB

    Answered No; Barack Obama still has a better chance of winning in November.

    No, it just means that WV is not ready for change.
  • raves +1 -1 [-] by renee77
    why dont you take a vacation there then you would knopw that isnt all they dont like LOL... but of course you wouldnt do that... they would love to have you show you the sites
  • raves   -3 [-] by standstill
    Of course you are right, WVn's are not ready to put their future in jeopardy
  • raves +4 -3 [-] by reg

    Answered Yes; It proves that Hillary Clinton has the working-class vote leading to higher "electability."

    We better hope she wins. Obama doesn't know nothing or MCcain.
  • raves +2 -3 [-] by Dackelmommy

    Answered No; Barack Obama still has a better chance of winning in November.

    Hopefully, there will be enough people still out there who are aware of what Billary has to offer - not in a good way, that is!
  • raves +4 -3 [-] by Coky

    Answered No; Barack Obama still has a better chance of winning in November.

    Obama is clearly ahead even without WV
  • raves +3 -3 [-] by gigi

    Answered No; Barack Obama still has a better chance of winning in November.

    No but it helps Barack become a better candidate for the fall....
    by any parameter you measure he will be the nominee
    1. more pledge delagates
    2.more superdelagates
    3.bigger popular vote
    4 more states
    5 last but not least more money !!!!
  • raves +2   [-] by Alpha
    I’m a Clinton supporter but the reality is that she has lost any chance of winning in the primary election. It is clear that she is staying in this race through Mr. Barack Obama’s presidential inauguration speech!
  • raves +2 -2 [-] by Bobbi