Angelina Jolie Caught Showing Her "TWINS." Is this an invasion of privacy?

Angelina Jolie was photographed breast feeding her children on her balcony while hubby Brad Pitt walked up with the children. The same balcony that had been constantly photographed all week. There is no way she could not have known that that was a paparazzi hot-spot, but she couldn't have done it on purpose....could she?

Answers
Results
Who Answered?

Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.
No. She shouldn't be topless on a balcony if she doesn't want people to take pictures.

Comment

Add Image Add Video

resize

* these fields are required to answer

* Nick Name

* Email

* Password

Gender

Male
Female

Birthdate

I agree to the SodaHead TOS and Privacy

Top Comment

raves +30 -9 by angie ~ MCCAIN / PALIN 08 posted May 19, 2008 07:19PM GMT

Answered Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.

moderated...

view thread

Sort By: Raves | Date 1 2 3 4 ... Next » Last » Comments

raves [-] by Riri posted Aug 14, 2008 09:31AM GMTAugust 14, 2008 09:31:18

reply

Answered Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.
paparazzi seriously need 2 get real jobs, they r so sleezy they dont care that they cross the line i mean come on they cant even have any privacy in their own home
raves [-] by autumn posted Jul 25, 2008 10:39PM GMTJuly 25, 2008 22:39:09

reply

Answered No. She shouldn't be topless on a balcony if she doesn't want people to take pictures.
she is stupid
raves [-] by bookie posted Jul 24, 2008 10:53PM GMTJuly 24, 2008 22:53:11

reply

Answered Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.
ppl just need to lay off this chick she doesnt know when there is going to b a camera around........
raves [-] by Yuki posted Jul 19, 2008 10:06PM GMTJuly 19, 2008 22:06:19

reply

Answered Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.
it's her own house and twins. why shouldn't she?
raves [-] by ASHLEY posted Jul 13, 2008 05:33AM GMTJuly 13, 2008 05:33:39

reply

Answered Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.
kids come before any one
raves [-] by stroodle posted Jul 10, 2008 05:00AM GMTJuly 10, 2008 05:00:52 (edited)

reply

Answered Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.
She has a right 2 have her own time with her family!! and the press needs 2 get a real life!!
raves [-] by ac posted Jul 01, 2008 08:19PM GMTJuly 01, 2008 20:19:55

reply

Answered No. She shouldn't be topless on a balcony if she doesn't want people to take pictures.
yes cuz why r u spying on her in the first place? i mean really it's just a celebrity she's not that big of a deal nor is any other celebrity they're just like us except they've been in a movie or two. btw im 11 and i'm smart enough to say this.
raves [-] by stroodle posted Jul 10, 2008 05:02AM GMTJuly 10, 2008 05:02:42

reply
Thats what the press needs 2 learn!!!
raves [-] by skyler posted Jun 30, 2008 04:27PM GMTJune 30, 2008 16:27:30

reply

Answered Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.
yes and no she should be in her house like you were just walking by and your kids poinded it out that wood be just plan nasty but on the other hand I agree with butters they shuold leve brad and Angelina jolie the fuck alone!!!
raves [-] by stroodle posted Jul 10, 2008 05:03AM GMTJuly 10, 2008 05:03:40

reply
Tru 2 dat man!!!
raves [-] by freshman413 posted Jun 29, 2008 04:49PM GMTJune 29, 2008 16:49:00

reply

Answered Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.
she can do what ever she wants it is her house...the paparzzi should leave her, brad, and their children alone...sometimes they just want to have some family time or just BREAST FEEDING her babies!
raves [-] by stroodle posted Jul 10, 2008 05:05AM GMTJuly 10, 2008 05:05:20

reply
Thats right u tell them how it is!!
raves [-] by JJ posted Jun 22, 2008 10:35AM GMTJune 22, 2008 10:35:17

reply

Answered Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.
even if she was just doing it for attention or publicity, it doesn't give them the right to photograph her topless
raves [-] by stroodle posted Jul 10, 2008 05:06AM GMTJuly 10, 2008 05:06:04 (edited)

reply
I no thats just wrong!!
raves +1 [-] by kolby posted Jun 20, 2008 02:42AM GMTJune 20, 2008 02:42:59

reply

Answered No. She shouldn't be topless on a balcony if she doesn't want people to take pictures.
well i think she should stay inside atleast
raves [-] by stroodle posted Jul 10, 2008 05:07AM GMTJuly 10, 2008 05:07:26

reply
ya also because her neighbors could c!!
raves -1 [-] by Bettye posted Jun 19, 2008 09:42PM GMTJune 19, 2008 21:42:42

reply

Answered No. She shouldn't be topless on a balcony if she doesn't want people to take pictures.
Saggy as they are looking, the hag need to cover them up, asap!
raves [-] by stroodle posted Jul 10, 2008 05:09AM GMTJuly 10, 2008 05:09:01 (edited)

reply
well u need 2 cover yours up you drama queen!!!
raves [-] by livvybelle posted Jun 18, 2008 06:20PM GMTJune 18, 2008 18:20:48

reply

Answered No. She shouldn't be topless on a balcony if she doesn't want people to take pictures.
What tha heck????????????????
raves -1 [-] by J-dawg posted Jun 18, 2008 03:15AM GMTJune 18, 2008 03:15:10

reply

Answered Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.
HaHa, niiice yo!!
raves [-] by stroodle posted Jul 10, 2008 05:10AM GMTJuly 10, 2008 05:10:42

reply
it is sortta funny!!!
raves +1 [-] by Katydidz posted Jun 18, 2008 01:53AM GMTJune 18, 2008 01:53:11

reply

Answered Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.
The stalkerazzi should not have been looking in her home.She should be able to have peace and privacy within her own house so they should'nt have been there.
raves [-] by stroodle posted Jul 10, 2008 05:12AM GMTJuly 10, 2008 05:12:14

reply
ya maybe she should go take pics. of them in the showers!![lol]
raves [-] by kolby posted Aug 26, 2008 02:01AM GMTAugust 26, 2008 02:01:34

reply
you are so sick
raves +1 [-] by Bry posted Jun 13, 2008 11:55PM GMTJune 13, 2008 23:55:47

reply

Answered No. She shouldn't be topless on a balcony if she doesn't want people to take pictures.
She's doing it for attention!
raves [-] by stroodle posted Jul 10, 2008 05:12AM GMTJuly 10, 2008 05:12:32

reply
she is not!!!
raves +1 [-] by Rachel posted Jun 13, 2008 10:20PM GMTJune 13, 2008 22:20:02

reply

Answered No. She shouldn't be topless on a balcony if she doesn't want people to take pictures.
yea i ttyl argree with Ashlynn Jonas
raves +1 [-] by lover posted Jun 13, 2008 09:01PM GMTJune 13, 2008 21:01:26

reply

Answered Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.
You like your privasy I like mine
raves [-] by stroodle posted Jul 10, 2008 05:13AM GMTJuly 10, 2008 05:13:10

reply
Thats sooooo true!!!
raves +1 [-] by ♥raerae♥♦ posted Jun 11, 2008 08:41PM GMTJune 11, 2008 20:41:23

reply

Answered Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.
well she doesn't really care if she went out topless so let her feed her children
raves [-] by stroodle posted Jul 10, 2008 05:13AM GMTJuly 10, 2008 05:13:26

reply
YA!
raves +1 [-] by spankable posted Jun 10, 2008 05:29PM GMTJune 10, 2008 17:29:57

reply

Answered Yes. She has a right to tend to her children at her own home without being bothered.
the freakin paparazzi needs 2 just mind there own freakin buisness and she COULD do her breast feeding inside!!!
raves [-] by stroodle posted Jul 10, 2008 05:13AM GMTJuly 10, 2008 05:13:46

reply
Thats true!!
raves -1 [-] by Ashlynn Jonas posted Jun 10, 2008 01:50AM GMTJune 10, 2008 01:50:45

reply

Answered No. She shouldn't be topless on a balcony if she doesn't want people to take pictures.
SHE DIDN'T EVEN HAD HER TWINS YET DUMMY
raves [-] by stroodle posted Jul 10, 2008 05:14AM GMTJuly 10, 2008 05:14:20 (edited)

reply
your the dummy she has had her twins!!
raves +1 [-] by BAM54 posted Jun 10, 2008 01:44AM GMTJune 10, 2008 01:44:16