Is Ron Paul The Pick For The Nazi Party As The President Of The United States Of America?

2007-11-07T02:19:08Z

Is Ron Paul The Pick For The Nazi Party As The President Of The United States Of America?

24 answers, +7 raves

This is the jist of what I am hearing and that he is a colomnist for a Fascist Publication> American Free Press> Thursday, October 25, 2007 LST: Neo-Nazi leader gives Ron Paul $500 by LST Staff | 10/25/2007 4:59 pm | Alert moderator LONESTARTIMES.COM EXCLUSIVE!!! Must credit LoneStarTimes.com!!! That means YOU, mainstream media producer/reporter/outlet! ————————- A LoneStarTimes.com investigation has conclusively established that a leading figure in the American neo-Nazi / White-Supremacist movement has provided financial support to Ron Paul’s 2008 Presidential campaign. The individual in question is Don Black, the founder, owner and operator of Stormfront, a “white power” website that both professional journalists and watch-dog groups have identified as the premier English-language racist/hate-site on the Internet. Previous LST posts have focused on banner “widgets” appearing on the front-page of Stormfront. It is important to emphasize that these are NOT “advertisements” placed on Stormfront BY the Paul campaign, but rather publicly-available graphics that Stormfront’s owner has chosen to place himself, with links directly to Paul’s donation page. Nevertheless, LST has in the past several weeks raised a series of questions for the Paul campaign; specifically– Can Paul confirm that the donation widgets appearing on Stormfront are the result of the site owner’s actions, not the campaign’s? Will Paul take measures to block Stormfront as a referring URL to his own website, so that no future donations can possibly flow into his campaign from a site that serves as the on-line nexus of neo-Nazism? Will Paul ask his own web-staff to trace past donations that were made by anyone arriving at his campaign’s webpage from Stormfront, so that these contributions can be rejected? Will Paul explore if there are any legal actions available to try to remove his donation widget from Stormfront, and if so pursue them? At the very least, will Paul personally state publicly, vigorously and unmistakably that he rejects the support of white supremacists, and that he will not knowingly tolerate their involvement with his campaign in any form or to any degree? LoneStarTimes.com’s managing editor Matt Bramanti left multiple messages last week for officials in Paul’s national campaign press office seeking comment. None were returned. In the interim, a number of grassroots supporters of Paul’s campaign– including many honorable and regular readers of LST– have argued that… It is unfair to hold Paul responsible for receiving political support from racists/neo-Nazis if that support was unsolicited by Paul; Paul hasn’t, in fact, solicited white-supremacist support; AND Paul’s campaign has no practical way of knowing whether or not a specific financial contribution made has come from a neo-Nazi. These abstract debates are now moot– a contribution to the Paul campaign by a known white-supremacist has been identified. The evidence is as follows: Black proudly and openly identifies himself as Stormfront’s guiding hand, and publishes a contact address on the Internet– PO Box 6637, West Palm Beach, FL, 33405 A search by LST of public databases indicates that there is only one “Don Black” residing in West Palm Beach, Florida, zip code 33405 A 7/16/01 USA Today article identifies Black’s wife as being named “Chloe” That same article identifies Chloe as being the ex-wife of close Black associate and former “Grand Wizard” of the Ku Klux Klan, David Duke Minutes of a 9/7/07 City of West Palm Beach code-compliance hearing identify “Chloe H. Duke” as owning a residential property located at 203 Lakeland Drive According to Federal Election Commission records, on 9/30/07 the Ron Paul presidential campaign received a $500 contribution from a Mr. Don Black, who lists his address as 203 Lakeland Drive and identifies his occupation as “self-employed/website manager” In light of these facts, we believe our previously asked questions continue to have merit. A final note– it is traditional in political campaigns for candidates to return contributions from “toxic” donors once sufficient public scrutiny and outcry has been generated. The difficulty in this instance is that if Ron Paul returns these funds to Mr. Black, all he will have done is given a neo-Nazi $500 more dollars with which to spread his psychotic bile. We would therefore like to suggest that the Ron Paul campaign donate Black’s $500 to any of the following worthy recipients– United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ($500 would make Dr. Paul a “sustaining member”) One Family Fund (which works to rebuild the shattered lives of Israeli victims of Arab terror; $500 would make Dr. Paul a “healer”) Aish Ha’Torah (dynamic Jewish educational foundation; Aish donations are set according to funky Kabbalah-based giving levels–$18, $36, $180, etc.–but for $500 Dr. Paul could simultaneously become a “Friend of the Wall” and a “Gate of Wisdom,” which would entitle him to both a Sterling Silver Menorah bookmark with certificate of authenticity from the Israel Museum in Jerusalem, and a Western Wall Images CD with over 500 unique photos of life at the Western Wall– perfect “re-gifting” items for the fast-approaching Hanukkah season) We try to be helpful. Matt Bramanti, Managing Editor (Gentile Stooge) David Benzion, Publisher (Z.O.G. Chapter #1948 President) LoneStarTimes.com

No.	42% (10 answers)
Undecided	29% (7 answers)
Who cares?	21% (5 answers)
Yes.	8% (2 answers)

UN Expert Seeks To Halt Biofuel Production, Do You Think We Should?

2007-10-28T14:49:37Z

UN Expert Seeks To Halt Biofuel Production, Do You Think We Should?

23 answers, +4 raves

UN Expert Seeks to Halt Biofuel Output By EDITH M. LEDERER, AP Fri Oct 26, 9:04 PM EDT UNITED NATIONS — A U.N. expert on Friday called the growing practice of converting food crops into biofuel "a crime against humanity," saying it is creating food shortages and price jumps that cause millions of poor people to go hungry. Jean Ziegler, who has been the United Nations' independent expert on the right to food since the position was established in 2000, called for a five-year moratorium on biofuel production to halt what he called a growing "catastrophe" for the poor. Scientific research is progressing very quickly, he said, "and in five years it will be possible to make biofuel and biodiesel from agricultural waste" rather than wheat, corn, sugar cane and other food crops. Using biofuel instead of gasoline in cars is generally considered to cut carbon dioxide emissions, which contribute to global warming, although some scientists say greenhouse gases released during the production of biofuel could offset those gains. The use of crops for biofuel has being pursued especially in Brazil and the United States. Last March, President Bush and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva signed an agreement committing their countries to boosting ethanol production. They said increasing use of alternative fuels would lead to more jobs, a cleaner environment and greater independence from the whims of the oil market. Ziegler called their motives legitimate, but said that "the effect of transforming hundreds and hundreds of thousands of tons of maize, of wheat, of beans, of palm oil, into agricultural fuel is absolutely catastrophic for the hungry people." The world price of wheat doubled in one year and the price of corn quadrupled, leaving poor countries, especially in Africa, unable to pay for the imported food needed to feed their people, he said. And poor people in those countries are unable to pay the soaring prices for the food that does come in, he added. "So it's a crime against humanity" to devote agricultural land to biofuel production, Ziegler said a news conference. "What has to be stopped is ... the growing catastrophe of the massacre (by) hunger in the world," he said. As an example, he said, it takes 510 pounds of corn to produce 13 gallons of ethanol. That much corn could feed a child in Zambia or Mexico for a year, he said. Benjamin Chang, a spokesman for the U.S. mission to the United Nations, said the Bush administration didn't consider biofuel development a threat to the poor. "It's clear we have a commitment to the development of biofuels," he said. "It's also clear that we are committed to combatting poverty and supporting economic development around the world as the leading contributor of overseas development assistance in the world." Ziegler, a sociology professor at the University of Geneva and the University of the Sorbonne in Paris, presented a report Thursday to the U.N. General Assembly's human rights committee saying a five-year moratorium on biofuel production would allow time for new technologies for using agricultural byproducts instead of food itself. Researchers are looking at crop residues such as corn cobs, rice husks and banana leaves, he said. "The cultivation of Jatropha Curcas, a shrub that produces large oil-bearing seeds, appears to offer a good solution as it can be grown in arid lands that are not normally suitable for food crops," he said.

No! We can save the Earth Driving on Corn.	52% (12 answers)
Yes! Corn is fer eatin! We are wasting it on a usless "feelgood" idea!	39% (9 answers)
Neither! Save the Corn for liquid consumption! This way we would be bored as the feel gooders and the practical folk battle it out.	9% (2 answers)

SodaHead - uranass's Questions

Is Ron Paul The Pick For The Nazi Party As The President Of The United States Of America?

UN Expert Seeks To Halt Biofuel Production, Do You Think We Should?