SodaHead.com - Autumn's Answers

1 2 Next » Last » Autumn's Answers

raves +12 by SodaHead Political Newsroom posted Oct 15, 2008 10:24PM GMTOctober 15, 2008 22:24:53

Sex Offender E-Mail Registry: Will John McCain's bill help stop sex offenders?
345 258

Answered: No, The Sexual Predators Act of 2008 won't stop sex offenders.

Answer Comment:

Date Answered: Oct 16, 2008 12:49AM GMTOctober 16, 2008 00:49:28
raves +40 by SodaHead Political Newsroom posted Oct 15, 2008 08:29PM GMTOctober 15, 2008 20:29:04

Third & Final Debate: Is It Game Over?
2,420 4,051

Answered: Yes. It's game over for John McCain.

Answer Comment:

Date Answered: Oct 16, 2008 12:48AM GMTOctober 16, 2008 00:48:36
raves +7 -3 by chacha posted Jun 08, 2008 05:41PM GMTJune 08, 2008 17:41:54

Obama, a man with two children of his own, believes that abortion, or "reproductive justice" is "one of the most fundamental rights we possess." He opposes laws that protect babies born alive during botched abortions." Can you truly support him?
59 211

Answered: None of the above

Answer Comment:
I am interested to know: Many of you say you are against abortion so you are supporting McCain but tell me how is sending our children off to war to be killed uselessly is any different. We haved children we give birth to, raise and spend a lifetime with and then they go off to fight a war that should have never been started and you support a man that says he would allow the children of this country to die for the next 100 years in Iraq if that is what it took. I have three birth children and one I am raising that is not mine and would have never considered abortion, and am personally against abortion but believe everyone has the right to make a choice for themselves. The morning after pill, great idea. In a perfect world this wouldn't be an issue but we don't have a perfect world. This should not be a political issue. I am not an Obama supporter but it isn't for this reason.

Date Answered: Jun 08, 2008 06:41PM GMTJune 08, 2008 18:41:03
raves by MAGGIE IRISH EYES posted May 18, 2007 10:26PM GMTMay 18, 2007 22:26:41

Do you think grandparents have the right to chastise their grandchildren if the children are in harms way?
11 8

Answered: Yes

Answer Comment:
Of course they should.

Date Answered: Apr 29, 2008 08:33PM GMTApril 29, 2008 20:33:53
raves +17 -3 by fluer ~ PUMA posted Mar 25, 2008 01:37AM GMTMarch 25, 2008 01:37:19

Judgement. Do you think Barack Obama has always shown good judgement?
52 141

Answered: No

Answer Comment:
If one of my friends or even family members made extremist racial remarks like Wright has and I wasn't in agreement I would stay as far away from them as possible...family or not. His judgement is very bad or he is totally in agreement with Wright.

Date Answered: Mar 25, 2008 04:51AM GMTMarch 25, 2008 04:51:20
raves +7 -2 by Jade posted Mar 19, 2008 10:31AM GMTMarch 19, 2008 10:31:12

Do you agree with the exception of Fox News, that the media is being bias towards Obama and his race speech and not examining it for its content line by line trying to dicate the winner of the Dems?
44 38

Answered: Yes

Answer Comment:
Something to think about, an article by a African American Columnist. Ken Blackwell - Columnist for the New York Sun It's an amazing time to be alive in America. We're in a year of firsts in this presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; the first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first frontrunning freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will be a first. We won't truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We won't arrive where we should be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender. Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his policies and his politics. The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the frontrunner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at him. Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He's not. He's the next George McGovern. And it's time people learned the facts. Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton. Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost. Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he's not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beauty pageant. Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead the United States of America. But let's look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial 'beauty.' Start with national security, since the president's most important duties are as commander-in- chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong II, who is murdering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists - something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk. Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama promises to raise taxes on 'the rich.' How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck. Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, 'All praise and glory to God!' but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have 'hijacked' - hijacked - Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Illinois, he refused to vote against a statewide ban - ban - on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood, and San Francisco values, not Middle America values. The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs. Clinton is a far tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people don't start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of 'bringing America together' means saying that those who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs. But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he is and - yes - they're talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama's radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left of Mrs. Clinton. It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let's first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.

Date Answered: Mar 24, 2008 04:20PM GMTMarch 24, 2008 16:20:40
raves +27 -5 by Edmund Jenks posted Mar 21, 2008 02:03AM GMTMarch 21, 2008 02:03:30

Is there such a thing as a "Typical White Person"?
296 588

Answered: No

Answer Comment:
People are people and should be judge by their character, not their race. I don't think there is a typical anything.

Date Answered: Mar 24, 2008 01:12AM GMTMarch 24, 2008 01:12:08
raves +9 by Bite Me (XSA) posted Mar 19, 2008 10:29PM GMTMarch 19, 2008 22:29:27

If you had to make this choice what would you do?
67 123

Answered: Vote for clinton.

Answer Comment:
Something to think about, an article by a African American Columnist. Ken Blackwell - Columnist for the New York Sun It's an amazing time to be alive in America. We're in a year of firsts in this presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; the first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first frontrunning freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will be a first. We won't truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We won't arrive where we should be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender. Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his policies and his politics. The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the frontrunner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at him. Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He's not. He's the next George McGovern. And it's time people learned the facts. Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton. Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost. Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he's not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beauty pageant. Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead the United States of America. But let's look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial 'beauty.' Start with national security, since the president's most important duties are as commander-in- chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong II, who is murdering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists - something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk. Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama promises to raise taxes on 'the rich.' How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck. Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, 'All praise and glory to God!' but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have 'hijacked' - hijacked - Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Illinois, he refused to vote against a statewide ban - ban - on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood, and San Francisco values, not Middle America values. The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs. Clinton is a far tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people don't start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of 'bringing America together' means saying that those who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs. But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he is and - yes - they're talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama's radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left of Mrs. Clinton. It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let's first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.

Date Answered: Mar 22, 2008 01:33AM GMTMarch 22, 2008 01:33:43
raves +23 -3 by lachica....{junebug} posted Mar 20, 2008 10:13PM GMTMarch 20, 2008 22:13:41

Clinton, Obama, or McCain, Who has your vote for our next president?
267 546

Answered: Hillary

Answer Comment:
Our only hope.

Date Answered: Mar 22, 2008 01:19AM GMTMarch 22, 2008 01:19:14
raves +9 by Grace W. Bush posted Mar 20, 2008 05:15PM GMTMarch 20, 2008 17:15:14

Osama Bin Laden condemns EU over Muhammad cartoons. Should this threat be taken seriously?
78 119

Answered: Yes. We just never know when he might strike again.

Answer Comment:
Anything this nut comes up with should be taken seriously.

Date Answered: Mar 21, 2008 12:10AM GMTMarch 21, 2008 00:10:07
raves +8 by Sister Jean posted Mar 19, 2008 12:28AM GMTMarch 19, 2008 00:28:06

New governor of New York and his wife admit to having affairs outside of marriage,are you shocked?
56 80

Answered: no

Answer Comment:
I would be shocked if they didn't, I am shocked they admit it. When are people going to learn that all through time politicians have had affairs.

Date Answered: Mar 21, 2008 12:02AM GMTMarch 21, 2008 00:02:35
raves +983 -100 by Freedomwatcher posted Jan 26, 2008 12:24AM GMTJanuary 26, 2008 00:24:54

John McCain or Barack Obama?
110,479 315,753

Answered: John McCain

Answer Comment:
Something to think about, an article by a African American Columnist. Ken Blackwell - Columnist for the New York Sun It's an amazing time to be alive in America. We're in a year of firsts in this presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; the first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first frontrunning freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will be a first. We won't truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We won't arrive where we should be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender. Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his policies and his politics. The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the frontrunner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at him. Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He's not. He's the next George McGovern. And it's time people learned the facts. Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton. Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost. Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he's not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beauty pageant. Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead the United States of America. But let's look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial 'beauty.' Start with national security, since the president's most important duties are as commander-in- chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong II, who is murdering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists - something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk. Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama promises to raise taxes on 'the rich.' How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck. Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, 'All praise and glory to God!' but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have 'hijacked' - hijacked - Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Illinois, he refused to vote against a statewide ban - ban - on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood, and San Francisco values, not Middle America values. The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs. Clinton is a far tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people don't start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of 'bringing America together' means saying that those who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs. But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he is and - yes - they're talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama's radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left of Mrs. Clinton. It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let's first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.

Date Answered: Mar 20, 2008 11:44PM GMTMarch 20, 2008 23:44:00
raves +11 by AppleSmack posted Mar 13, 2008 09:00PM GMTMarch 13, 2008 21:00:13

Do you agree with Obama's pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. when he says "God Damn America, and U.S. is to blame for 9/11"???
105 150

Answered: Obama's Pastor, Rev. Wright Jr. is WRONG: God BLESS America!

Answer Comment:

Date Answered: Mar 20, 2008 10:50PM GMTMarch 20, 2008 22:50:31
raves +10 -11 by Ken posted Mar 20, 2008 02:29AM GMTMarch 20, 2008 02:29:15

What do you think of Barack Obama throwing his Granny under the bus and sticking by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright in his speech on race?
107 327

Answered: Racial hatred is never justified, and grandmothers deserve more respect!

Answer Comment:

Date Answered: Mar 20, 2008 10:48PM GMTMarch 20, 2008 22:48:18
raves +47 -8 by chacha posted Mar 15, 2008 06:26PM GMTMarch 15, 2008 18:26:41

Do you believe Obama's statement that he "never" heard Rev. Wright's views condemning America before now?
386 1,284

Answered: With ears like his? He must be deaf or lying.

Answer Comment:

Date Answered: Mar 20, 2008 08:34PM GMTMarch 20, 2008 20:34:38
raves +6 -1 by KARA posted Feb 12, 2008 09:51PM GMTFebruary 12, 2008 21:51:31

Do you think that Hillary Clinton will win in the Texas and Ohio Democratic Primary’s on March 4th?
92 118

Answered: Yes

Answer Comment:

Date Answered: Mar 01, 2008 12:04AM GMTMarch 01, 2008 00:04:17
raves +23 -4 by JefTex posted Feb 27, 2008 11:48PM GMTFebruary 27, 2008 23:48:04

Should Hillary Clinton drop out of the race for the Democratic presidential nomination if she fails to win the Texas and Ohio primaries?
344 462

Answered: No. Mrs. Clinton has campaigned too long and hard to give up before someone reaches the number of delegates needed for the nomination.

Answer Comment:

Date Answered: Mar 01, 2008 12:02AM GMTMarch 01, 2008 00:02:50
raves +99 -11 by Gramma Lil posted Feb 15, 2008 07:17PM GMTFebruary 15, 2008 19:17:23

Which Presidential candidate would do the most damage to the United States if elected President in 2008?
2,259 2,795

Answered: Rep. John McCain

Answer Comment:

Date Answered: Feb 26, 2008 08:58PM GMTFebruary 26, 2008 20:58:46
raves +14 -3 by FanOreilly posted Feb 25, 2008 07:21AM GMTFebruary 25, 2008 07:21:43

Do you think less of Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton for mocking Barack Hussein Obama?
165 258

Answered: No

Answer Comment:

Date Answered: Feb 26, 2008 08:33PM GMTFebruary 26, 2008 20:33:12
raves +3 -2 by fluer ~ PUMA posted Feb 08, 2008 01:24PM GMTFebruary 08, 2008 13:24:49

Mr. Obama wrote in his book that he used Blow in school when he could afford it to calm hiim down. Do you think this is acceptable behavior?
30 86

Answered: No it is not OK and I don't want my kids to ever be able to sa y the President did it so it is OK

Answer Comment:

Date Answered: Feb 08, 2008 02:59PM GMTFebruary 08, 2008 14:59:00

1 2 Next » Last »