SodaHead.com - Kiley's Answers

Kiley's Answers

raves +7 -1 by kelci_a_thryce posted Apr 11, 2008 07:49PM GMTApril 11, 2008 19:49:14

Which is the true Obama?
22 46

Answered: Undecided

Answer Comment:
I'm unsure. I just know he's disappointed me lately, but I've had no time to follow the latest. Anybody know what's up? Where do we stand?

Date Answered: Apr 11, 2008 08:34PM GMTApril 11, 2008 20:34:00
raves +5 by MAGGIE IRISH EYES posted Feb 03, 2008 04:49PM GMTFebruary 03, 2008 16:49:36

Do you think taxidermy of pets is creepy?
20 27

Answered: Yes

Answer Comment:
Eww.

Date Answered: Apr 04, 2008 03:18PM GMTApril 04, 2008 15:18:50
raves +47 -3 by Free Throw posted Mar 31, 2008 06:34PM GMTMarch 31, 2008 18:34:02

THE QUOTE OF THE MONTH IS BY JAY LENO : DO YOU AGREE?
270 529

Answered: Yes

Answer Comment:
ABSOLUTELY

Date Answered: Apr 04, 2008 03:10PM GMTApril 04, 2008 15:10:44
raves +38 -6 by rushsupporter posted Mar 08, 2008 05:25PM GMTMarch 08, 2008 17:25:54

President Bush Vetoed Waterboarding Bill!?
162 1,334

Answered: Undecided

Answer Comment:
One of the hardest questions in the world to answer. When the logic is drilled down to its most basic underlying principles, the inevitable question must be: IS WAR NECESSARY? If war is necessary, the conditions under which it can potentially be waged must be determined. Once those conditions are met, and a war is waged, it becomes necessary to determine what we can and cannot put up with. But our enemy's tactics must be the line that we use to determine our course of action. We must look at the actions of the enemy and make tough decisions about how far we are willing to go to accomplish our goals. At the very heart of it all is the need to protect our people. Protection comes at a high cost when the enemy is willing to pay with their lives.

Date Answered: Apr 03, 2008 01:58PM GMTApril 03, 2008 13:58:04
raves +34 by rushsupporter posted Mar 20, 2008 06:26AM GMTMarch 20, 2008 06:26:47

Does McCain,Obama or Clinton have your support today?
194 511

Answered: Undecided between Obama and Hillary

Answer Comment:
Still missing an option in your poll - Undecided between Hillary, Obama, and McCain. I have yet to research McCain - what little I've noticed of him from the past, I recall having liked him as a person when I've seen him on various talk shows over the years and on some news debate panels. He has always seemed clear-headed and dedicated. As far as I can remember, I do not remember his name standing out amongst the list of Republicans under fire for all sorts of indiscretions. In my book, McCain is a possible person to vote for, but I will have to research his history, his intentions, his plans, and anything I can find about him in the international news sites online before making a decision. Hillary is a woman I despised before the Billy fiascos, and even more so after her "stand by my thing we call a man" thing. I suppose the two of them have redeemed themselves in my eyes somewhat since then. Two years ago I was determined to always believe I would never vote for a woman for president because she would be forever under the scrutiny of a male dominated system and would be seen as a menstruating witch or a sappy emotional mess. With all I've discovered about Obama, I've changed my tune quite a bit on that. Obama...well, don't get me started. And there you have it folks, the ever important opinion of mine. :)

Date Answered: Apr 03, 2008 01:43PM GMTApril 03, 2008 13:43:54
raves +23 by rushsupporter posted Mar 20, 2008 06:04AM GMTMarch 20, 2008 06:04:25

So who do you support now? Obama or Hillary?
82 315

Answered: Hillary is my president!

Answer Comment:
A little too one-sided for me (the answers, I mean.) I'm not so sure Hillary is my president (or that she'll be given that opportunity). But I do know that Obama once inspired me and since has disgusted me with each new disappointment. And I know that where I once looked to this election with hope, I now look upon it with dread. And I attribute that squarely to Obama.

Date Answered: Apr 03, 2008 01:36PM GMTApril 03, 2008 13:36:36
raves +52 -17 by mentonemommy posted Apr 01, 2008 11:06AM GMTApril 01, 2008 11:06:52

What do you think Bush was thinking as he was booed off the playing field at the Nationals game?
295 1,633

Answered: He was thinking...

Answer Comment:
Damn, that pitch was high and to the side.

Date Answered: Apr 01, 2008 10:18PM GMTApril 01, 2008 22:18:09
raves +1 by Kiley posted Apr 01, 2008 09:23PM GMTApril 01, 2008 21:23:51

What constitutes a good SodaHead question?
3 11

Answered: Dunno, but I'd sure like to...

Answer Comment:
Cuz I tried to figure it out and failed.

Date Answered: Apr 01, 2008 09:25PM GMTApril 01, 2008 21:25:04
raves by ~Nicole~ posted Apr 01, 2008 04:04PM GMTApril 01, 2008 16:04:23

Is there anything that you always carry with you?
14 33

Answered: Yes

Answer Comment:
My mind.

Date Answered: Apr 01, 2008 04:12PM GMTApril 01, 2008 16:12:28
raves +52 -8 by kelci_a_thryce posted Mar 15, 2008 06:12AM GMTMarch 15, 2008 06:12:49

Can you prove there is no God?
411 1,659

Answered: What about...

Answer Comment:
Several things have to be defined in order to answer this question. First, what is God? Is he an all-knowing, perfect being? Are there any other gods above or below him or at his same level? After people agree on a definition of god, then you can go about discussing whether it's possible that that thing is really true. The next important thing to agree upon would be whether people are, in any way, shape or form, in existence before they come to earth. Because if so, the discussion can lead to a whole different place - why do they come to earth? Did God create them? Do they choose to come? Could they be punished or need to learn lessons? Could they be taking vacation? On the other hand, if it is decided, even just for argument's sake, that no person is in existence, in any form, before being born in this life we're all experiencing, then it narrows the discussion considerably. Why does God keep creating new individuals? Did he create a certain number of them in the beginning and has been recycling them ever since? Of course, once the first two questions are settled (definition of God and existence of individual before birth) then the question is - what happens after death? If we wish to entertain concepts of heaven and hell, we have to agree first that it is possible something happens after we die. If we agree to entertain that idea, even if just for argument's sake, then we can discuss the likelihoods that exist from there. A real probing of the possibilities is necessary before a discussion of proof can begin. And if the parameters are set first, there is no need to discuss it in terms of the Bible or religion - we'd just be playing a game of "what-if?" Of course, a conversation that exhausts all of those possibilities would take a lifetime to have, wouldn't it? But, even if you believe in the God of Christians or any other god, what god would condemn a man for seeking truth? If that god is your god, then why do you want to follow him? Very heavy questions, yes.

Date Answered: Apr 01, 2008 04:09PM GMTApril 01, 2008 16:09:24
raves +10 by Dogg ~socialism is not hope posted Mar 21, 2008 02:58AM GMTMarch 21, 2008 02:58:29

N.W.O. A unbais poll?
46 72

Answered: None of the above

Answer Comment:
i bet that if my eyes weren't glazed over after scrolling all the way down this poll that there are some great points that were made. i'm sorry, but i just seem to be to a.d.d. today to stomach it though. i've done lots of homework, though, and i don't think any of the candidates are out from corporate america's thumbs, so i don't think i'd vote for any of em.

Date Answered: Mar 31, 2008 07:53AM GMTMarch 31, 2008 07:53:36
raves +24 by Ihr Hase posted Mar 26, 2008 11:22PM GMTMarch 26, 2008 23:22:13

Is honesty important in a presidential candidate?
59 120

Answered: Yes

Answer Comment:
And I will be honest - I only read the first couple paragraphs of this post, but seeing that it looks like their talking about something that happened over ten years ago says one thing to me, if in fact they're trying to slam clinton - if they have to dig that far back to find a contradiction in her past, what does that say about her record? if they have to dig that far back and dredge up such old crap, what does that say about her experience? can we find any such discrepancies in obama? if not, why not? could it be the lack of time? is honesty important? yeah. y not be honest about y they're each there? hillary's been gunning for president since about twenty years before bill was a hopeful. obama's been avoiding it until his status as a popular black hopeful paid his way into a jumpstarted campaign he didn't want this time around. mccain's some old guy that's just riding the wake of the democrats who can't get their crap together and haven't learned what the concept of history repeating itself is all about, so he'll end up winning by default. i'm hoping a good independent gets in there and screws it up for all of them. at least maybe i'll have somebody to vote for.

Date Answered: Mar 31, 2008 07:50AM GMTMarch 31, 2008 07:50:09
raves +3 -1 by zzlat posted Mar 21, 2008 04:40AM GMTMarch 21, 2008 04:40:44

In your mind, who's statements where worse, Don Imus' or Rev. Wright's?
48 45

Answered: Rev. Wright

Answer Comment:
Imus is a harmless fool whose job is to entertain a bunch of people who think it is funny to make fun of other people. Wright is a harmful fool whose job it is to teach people who think he should know how to treat other people.

Date Answered: Mar 31, 2008 07:40AM GMTMarch 31, 2008 07:40:59
raves +11 by kelci_a_thryce posted Mar 30, 2008 07:50PM GMTMarch 30, 2008 19:50:01

Rev Wright's successor, Rev Moss III, when asked about the racism controversey, said "It seems to scare people when African-Americans assert their race." What do you think?
20 125

Answered: I think you're so right, and ...

Answer Comment:
I'm glad to see someone have the balls to say it.

Date Answered: Mar 31, 2008 07:36AM GMTMarch 31, 2008 07:36:55
raves +38 -1 by Gramma Lil posted Mar 18, 2008 08:29PM GMTMarch 18, 2008 20:29:49

What is your favorite thing to do at Easter?
115 128

Answered: None of the above

Answer Comment:
Watching the little ones hunt for eggs and their Easter baskets and seeing their faces as they encounter each new treat!

Date Answered: Mar 31, 2008 06:43AM GMTMarch 31, 2008 06:43:54
raves +14 -8 by Tresor De Chocolat~Obama rocks posted Mar 20, 2008 08:03AM GMTMarch 20, 2008 08:03:54

Special comment to Hillary Clinton.?
41 248

Answered: No

Answer Comment:
Geraldine Ferraro spoke the truth - like it or not, we live in a country that views males more importantly than blacks, more importantly than females. Has anyone in America remembered the date that black men got the right to vote? How dare anyone suggest that a woman has no right to BITCH as loudly as a black man? Men insist on putting women down, but it's ok, because it doesn't come with a RACISM label. This man should be ashamed for talking about women in this way. Anyone who can't even hear the derrogatory demeaning tone towards women should shut up if they ever think that racism is bad. Ferraro acknowledged the truth - she was put in the VP slot BECAUSE SHE WAS A WOMAN. Obama wasn't ready to be running for president - he told us all that two years ago, yet, when the funding came through, and the pastors convinced the black parishioners that Obama was their man, and when the black money came forward with Obama's name written all over it, Obama was made the presidential candidate. The fact that he went along with it while Hillary Clinton intended it doesn't make me a racist, doesn't make Ferraro a racist, doesn't make Hillary a racist, doesn't make anyone a racist - it makes us all realists! Clinton didn't ask to be the woman candidate. Neither did Ferraro. Ferraro went along with it, Hillary made it happen. Before you judge me - consider this - I have not decided who to vote for I am equally divided between Barack Obama's charismatic, idealistic empty promises, Hillary's insistent, bitchy, overpowering, experienced, democratic promises, and McCain's age-old, tried and true, militaristic, desperate-to-separate-from-Bu... promises! I'll make up my mind when one of them proves a little more worthiness than another. But this video is nothing but a diatribe that made me so sick I could not listen to another second of the masochistic, male chovenist, ACCEPTED bullshit that Americans eat up after 3:57.

Date Answered: Mar 31, 2008 06:00AM GMTMarch 31, 2008 06:00:57
raves +97 -7 by Old Timer posted Mar 12, 2008 12:13AM GMTMarch 12, 2008 00:13:14

SH'S, IS IT TRUE that ONLY WHITE'S ARE RACIST? Please read this carefully and thoughtfully before you jump on my stuff.?
202 1,630

Answered: No

Answer Comment:
It's not true that only whites are racist. I've often wondered about this, and I think the first thing for a discussion like this is to get people to come to an agreement about the meaning of racism. So, when I go online and look up the definition, I get this from wikipedia: "Racism has many definitions, the most common being that members of one racial group consider themselves intrinsically superior to members of other racial groups. Racism inherently starts with the assumption that there are taxonomic differences between different groups of people. Without this assumption, prejudices against different peoples would be categorised as being prejudices related to national or regional origin, religion, occupation, social status or some other distinction." And this from the Meriam-Webster site: " a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race." I am white, I fit into neither definition. If non-white people view me in such a way that makes them feel superior to me - whether it is because I deserve such treatment, or whether it is caused by an over-reaction to their plights - then those people are racist. Therefore, not only whites are capable of racism.

Date Answered: Mar 31, 2008 05:45AM GMTMarch 31, 2008 05:45:53
raves +2 by Florida Keys posted Mar 30, 2008 10:14PM GMTMarch 30, 2008 22:14:36

Study: Cell Phones Could Be More Dangerous Than Cigarettes Does this bother you? How Many hours a day do you talk?
11 13

Answered: None of the above

Answer Comment:
I've smoked since I was in my twenties...why not ask whether people are worried about their health if they smoke?

Date Answered: Mar 31, 2008 05:25AM GMTMarch 31, 2008 05:25:31