SodaHead.com - Meeps' Answers

1 2 Next » Last » Meeps' Answers

raves +7 by mrosen814 posted Oct 19, 2008 04:38PM GMTOctober 19, 2008 16:38:48

What did you think of the Palin rap on SNL??
43 43

Answered: Hilarious!!!

Answer Comment:
I think it was funny but ultimately does nothing to change my opinion of Sarah Palin on the issues.

Date Answered: Oct 22, 2008 07:27PM GMTOctober 22, 2008 19:27:23
raves +26 by PigsOnSoma posted Sep 10, 2008 12:35AM GMTSeptember 10, 2008 00:35:14

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. What does this mean to you?
77 320

Answered: Undecided

Answer Comment:
I think your question is incomplete, it does not include the rational behind the second amendment, namely, that in a time of war, because all the population has the right to bear arms, they will be more capable of joining a wartime militia when they are drafted. Since we no longer have the draft, the circumstances around which Americans are entitled to own firearms has also changed. There is a need for guns in terms of hunting, but you really do not need an AK-47 to hunt deer or wolves. A simple rifle will do better than any weapon intended for warfare.

Date Answered: Sep 11, 2008 06:54PM GMTSeptember 11, 2008 18:54:12
raves +66 -9 by Mouthpiece posted Mar 28, 2007 08:04PM GMTMarch 28, 2007 20:04:29

Was the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center and other targets a conspiracy?
1,220 1,384

Answered: Undecided

Answer Comment:
I do not think the public has access to nor knows how to even find the facts to support a conspiracy theory. The only thing we do know is that 9/11 served the interests of the Republicans in every possible way. That coupled with the fact that Republicans did indeed capitalize on the deaths of 4k Americans should be proof enough to make you vote Democrat.

Date Answered: Sep 11, 2008 06:43PM GMTSeptember 11, 2008 18:43:02
raves +42 -3 by Roberto-Pro-America-Anti Obama posted Sep 06, 2008 03:02AM GMTSeptember 06, 2008 03:02:11

This is why we need McCain and Palin instead of neophyte Obama. Agree?
139 468

Answered: No, Barack can handle it even though he has no experience.

Answer Comment:
The world is screwed up. The fact is America has no position with which to tell other nations what to do when they all hate us. Obama will fix this situation because he actually has a skill at diplomacy, or would you say being almost totally unknown and getting 18 million votes is not impressive? Why did people flock to Obama's standard? Because he actually delivered answers that made sense and committed him to a position on an issue. In terms of the state of the country, Obama will improve it by investing in the people of the United States. McCain will give you classically social conservative issues like ending abortion and denying gay people basic human rights.

Date Answered: Sep 08, 2008 07:47PM GMTSeptember 08, 2008 19:47:47
raves +11 by PETE WENTZ posted Jul 16, 2008 11:37PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 23:37:31

WII OR XBOX360?
100 94

Answered: XBOX360

Answer Comment:
I like the Xbox360 by far because the games are more mature and the xbox live feature is too robust to not use. Built in voice chat works really well, a lot of people are playing online and the graphics are better. More unique games on WII but I just cannot stand the wii remote, it makes my wrist hurt just thinking about it.

Date Answered: Jul 17, 2008 06:57PM GMTJuly 17, 2008 18:57:33
raves +52 -9 by Angel posted Jul 14, 2008 12:19AM GMTJuly 14, 2008 00:19:49

Did you know this was in Obama's Book Is this someone we can see as the President of our great nation!!!!?
134 1,024

Answered: None of the above

Answer Comment:
Obama is biracial and has obviously had a hard time understanding his role in the world. He has probably been shunned by white and black people because of his heritage, since his books are autobiographical, it seems obvious that you pulled these quotes out of his book as he narrates the thoughts and ideals that shaped him as he changed into an adult. Are you defined solely by things you thought and did at a young age? Or is it possible that you have changed as a result of experiences?

Date Answered: Jul 16, 2008 03:08PM GMTJuly 16, 2008 15:08:45
raves +985 -100 by Freedomwatcher posted Jan 26, 2008 12:24AM GMTJanuary 26, 2008 00:24:54

John McCain or Barack Obama?
110,519 318,513

Answered: Barack Obama

Answer Comment:
Hey Republicans, you guys have been controlling the course of the country for eight years and the country is an absolute mess. Why are you so interested in ignoring the facts around you? 0.01% of the population has made a lot of the money and everyone else has tread water or lost their homes. Does this this sound like a situation where you want someone who said "I don't really know anything about the economy" in the white house?

Date Answered: May 30, 2008 02:55PM GMTMay 30, 2008 14:55:52
raves +84 -8 by SodaHead Political Newsroom posted May 29, 2008 06:57PM GMTMay 29, 2008 18:57:00

Is Scott McClellan lying about George W. Bush?
2,809 2,467

Answered: No; Scott McClellan is telling the truth. His book reveals the real story.

Answer Comment:
Scott McClellan is telling the story the way he experienced it. There are far too many people working at the white house for any one person to have a sole understanding of the truth. However, having lived through the period in question, and having known all that I did, I knew at the time that the english intelligence report that the weapons of mass destruction was based was a total fraud and the world community had declared it so. (well the non-mainstream press and the rest of the world press part of the world community.

Date Answered: May 30, 2008 02:30PM GMTMay 30, 2008 14:30:31
raves +32 -2 by Jerry posted Jan 24, 2008 11:30PM GMTJanuary 24, 2008 23:30:35

Do Liberals think of Conservatives as biggoted, racist, homophobes?
121 308

Answered: Undecided

Answer Comment:
We need to learn how to have an intelligent conversation. What is a label like liberal or conservative. These things mean many different things to many different people, so why pretend that they have any cohesive meaning when applied to millions of people. For convenience we use the terms, but it is important to remember that they are flawed barometers for anything real. What are the issues people want to talk about, what is the republican solution? What is the democratic solution? If we answer these questions perhaps we could get along at the same time as we actually could create a concensus and move forward as a country.

Date Answered: May 13, 2008 10:25PM GMTMay 13, 2008 22:25:48
raves +28 -35 by MARKY | * HRC-VP * posted May 07, 2008 03:00AM GMTMay 07, 2008 03:00:18

Would you rather vote for McCain, a home grown American, or Obama, a home grown terrorist?
124 395

Answered: None of the above

Answer Comment:
What have the republicans done for this country? Please name one substantive thing.

Date Answered: May 13, 2008 10:20PM GMTMay 13, 2008 22:20:22
raves +138 -4 by lachica....{junebug} posted May 07, 2008 05:13AM GMTMay 07, 2008 05:13:49

Should "In God We Trust" be taken off of US money?
9,172 6,732

Answered: Yes

Answer Comment:
I think it is ironic that God is put on money. Why would you want to sully Jesus by putting his name on money? Jesus was the one to turn over the merchants tables in the synogogue, no?

Date Answered: May 13, 2008 09:47PM GMTMay 13, 2008 21:47:49
raves +31 -6 by SodaHead Political Newsroom posted May 06, 2008 02:00AM GMTMay 06, 2008 02:00:10

If Iran attacks Israel, who would you want as President?
1,802 1,474

Answered: Barack Obama

Answer Comment:
In the unlikely event that Iran chose to commit suicide, I would want a president who would use this event to create major change in the Middle East. Barack Obama would defend Israel and save it from the Iranians just the same as any of the other two Presidents would. With Barack, the possibility of Iran invading would drop.

Date Answered: May 13, 2008 09:42PM GMTMay 13, 2008 21:42:44
raves +143 -19 by SodaHead Political Newsroom posted May 05, 2008 09:04PM GMTMay 05, 2008 21:04:16

Clinton or Obama, which Democratic candidate should drop out?
24,269 28,476

Answered: Neither, because . . .

Answer Comment:
Let the process run its course. It will mean more democrats registered to vote in the general election, which is good thing if we want to avoid being ruled by insane people who do not know the word "compromise." If these people had to choose which child to save from a fire they would probably let both of them die.

Date Answered: May 13, 2008 09:36PM GMTMay 13, 2008 21:36:54
raves +57 -6 by SodaHead Political Newsroom posted May 13, 2008 06:44PM GMTMay 13, 2008 18:44:16

Does a West Virginia win mean Hillary Clinton still has a chance as Democratic nominee?
3,246 3,401

Answered: No; Barack Obama still has a better chance of winning in November.

Answer Comment:
I believe West Virginia will be a part of the equation for the general election, but the idea that democrats will not vote for Obama is absurd. Obama will win many white voters in the general election when there is no Hillary in the equation.

Date Answered: May 13, 2008 09:33PM GMTMay 13, 2008 21:33:02
raves +3 by BOND007 posted Aug 31, 2007 03:30PM GMTAugust 31, 2007 15:30:17

Who do you think will be the next president?
274 126

Answered: Barack Obama

Answer Comment:

Date Answered: Oct 09, 2007 09:48PM GMTOctober 09, 2007 21:48:18
raves +5 by Mouthpiece posted May 08, 2007 12:37AM GMTMay 08, 2007 00:37:03

Rudy Giuliani or Barack Obama: In a head-to-head presidential election, who would you vote for?
321 137

Answered: Sen. Barack Obama (D)

Answer Comment:

Date Answered: Oct 09, 2007 09:36PM GMTOctober 09, 2007 21:36:08
raves +2 by JackBauer posted Jun 20, 2007 03:26PM GMTJune 20, 2007 15:26:55

Would you vote for Michael Bloomberg in the 2008 presidential election if he ran as an independent?
31 20

Answered: Yes

Answer Comment:

Date Answered: Oct 09, 2007 09:35PM GMTOctober 09, 2007 21:35:25
raves by PBL posted Sep 20, 2007 03:14PM GMTSeptember 20, 2007 15:14:58

Do you believe war was declared on America?
10 9

Answered: No

Answer Comment:
The hijackers on September 11th were criminals only. You are playing into Al Queda's hands when you treat them as a nation, which is what they need to be in order to declare war on anyone. Ask yourself this question, if 20 Americans hijacked planes in Russia and attacked their government, stock exchange and military centers, would you think that America was declaring war on Russia? Of course you would not, those Americans would be criminals. DUH...

Date Answered: Oct 09, 2007 08:51PM GMTOctober 09, 2007 20:51:27
raves by Tanner posted Sep 06, 2007 11:55PM GMTSeptember 06, 2007 23:55:31

When can we expect a free, democratic Iraq?
9 10

Answered: Never

Answer Comment:
Unless the antiquated, sexist, chauvinistic, and militaristic society of Islam is transformed into the opposite of all those qualities, then NEVER. If these changes do come about, or at least partially so, then perhaps in 50 years.

Date Answered: Oct 09, 2007 08:40PM GMTOctober 09, 2007 20:40:21
raves +3 by K man posted Jun 04, 2007 03:25PM GMTJune 04, 2007 15:25:49

Democrats Get Combative Over Iraq; who won the debate?
38 20

Answered: Barack Obama

Answer Comment:
Obviously Barack Obama won because he was the only who stated the clear answer. The war was a mistake and it should never have happened. However, we are in the middle of it now and we have to find a way to trap the rest of the world in the war so that we at least look like we tried when we leave (after finally realizing we cannot win this war or choose a future for a country full of people who hate the US and believe we are only in Iraq to use them for our own gain). Once we leave, the terrorists will not be able to blow things up as easily because then it will be clear that the terrorists are to blame. As long as the US is there the terrorists have a get out of jail free card because when your house blows up and you are the lone survivor, you have no clue as to whether Al Queda did it or the US did it. The iraqis clearly choose America more often than not because we actually have a history as a nation of persecuting muslims. They do not choose Al Queda as often because they are not a NATION. The terrorists are not a NATION, this is a hugely important fact. This makes them more vulnerable in that they do not have as many resources as a nation, but it makes them far more dangerous when you treat them like a nation rather than criminals (which is what they are). Invading Iraq was in effect treating Al Queda as if they were a NATION. Why does nobody understand this?

Date Answered: Oct 09, 2007 08:37PM GMTOctober 09, 2007 20:37:29

1 2 Next » Last »